This thread is more or less intended to be a public discussion regarding the merits of faith and the merits of skepticism, and related topics, primarily between the orgahs mentioned above.
Commentary from other orgahs is welcome, but I ask that it be spoilered:So that the primary advocates can more easily read and respond to one another.Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Askthepizzaguy will argue that faith in and of itself has little merit, and skepticism in and of itself does. However, Askthepizzaguy will not condemn any religion, any person, nor say that religious teachings haven't been positive influences on the world as well as sometimes negative. The discussion is more about the value of faith versus skepticism and related topics, and it will be a friendly, welcoming discussion or it will not happen at all; I will bow out courteously, and if I overstep my bounds (being human) I would welcome reminders and criticisms to edit out less helpful commentary.
Rhyfelwyr will advocate for faith and its merits, I suspect. However, I will not put words in his mouth; I will allow him to express his own positions.
I must stress respect at all times here for all members, observers and advocates. However, the opinions expressed here must be open to fair criticism, as it is the topic.
_____________
My opening statement is very brief; I contend that faith itself does not bring any merit, but that certain philosophical viewpoints are valid, invalid, or irrelevant. I also contend that objectivity and skepticism, a scientific and literal approach to philosophy and ethics and morality, is not only possible, but preferable to faith-based teachings and traditions. But I am not simply looking to advocate one is better than the other; I am genuinely curious to hear what the merits of faith are, from your perspective, and perhaps give examples of where faith has played a crucial and positive role in life.
I welcome the opening statement by Rhyfelwyr.
![]()
Bookmarks