Not flaming Ca

[Daveybaby]

I'm not a fan of invasive DRM software in any way (there are several games i havent bought purely because of the DRM technology theyve used), yet i really dont have any problem whatsoever with STEAM (once it got patched to the point that it works correctly). It's not invasive (note that steam can be configured to NOT RUN AT ALL on your computer unless you manually fire it up when you want to play a game), it's not spyware (does anyone have any kind of proof of this?) and it doesnt create any performance penalty (it possibly might have in the early days, but it doesnt on any system i've seen in the last 3 years). I'd much rather have steam than securom any day.

Here's what steam DOES give you. Quick and regular patches. And more of them. It streamlines the patching process and makes it cheaper. There have been four patches released already - more than we ever got in total for M2TW. The only people who have a legitimate problem with STEAM are those who it doesnt work for - it's not 100% bug free even now, so there are some people out there who can't play the game they paid for. But some people wouldnt have been able to play anyway due to invasive DRM on a standalone DVD release.

I'm all in favour of being in total control of what's running on my computer, but being paranoid about STEAM violating your precious data privacy when the operating system you've installed it on is microsoft goddamned windows is... beyond ridiculous.