At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.
Yes really , luther was well pissed with some of the changes and developments , he even changed some the words in the bible to show everyone how pissed off he was . He wanted a return to a "purer" church .Not really, some of the bad practices which emerged might have tipped the balance, but few of the reformers viewed themselves as trying to return to an earlier, purer church.
Many Muslims ? I thought this was about the fundies . say for example the saudi fruitcakes who harp on about a return to the good old Caliphate yet follow a sect that opposed the good old CaliphateThis is in contrast to many Muslims who look back to the Caliphate.
Yes he wanted to sort out some of the corruptions which had emerged such as indulgences and some funny doctrines, but he was quite disillusioned with the whole Papal-style church system by the end of his life, not just its incarnation during his time. And Luther only represents the first phase of the Reformation, Calvin could harldy be said to be looking backward to a mythic past church, his doctrines were all new, even if he was influenced somewhat by Augustine.
There's nothing wrong with looking back to Islam's golden age. If Christians and Muslims could get on in Andalusia a millenia ago, you would think they could do it nowadays. There's nothing wrong with Christians or Muslims looking back to such times, at least not from a secular point of view.
At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.
my bad misunderstood you
i learned a very interesting piece on the 7 nations issue.
the rambam answers that G-d needed a monotheistic society in Israel. he offered to the 7 nations that if they would believe in him they could stay, but if not, they had to be expelled.
On the Path to the Streets of Gold: a Suebi AAR
Visited:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hvil i fred HoreToreA man who casts no shadow has no soul.
Bookmarks