Great video.
Thank you Alex and welcome to our.![]()
Great video.
Thank you Alex and welcome to our.![]()
Proud Roman General
![]()
Man those old 60s movies where they actually used ridiculus amounts of extras were so much more epic...
Also for the whole Leroy Jenkins stunt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUaf...eature=related
But yeah, what Ludens said. It probably wouldn't be so easy during combat conditions depending on how hard you're being hit and casualties.
Last edited by antisocialmunky; 04-04-2009 at 14:46.
Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.
"Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
Great movie... fantastic tactics
Roma victoria
Very nice video, and I agree that the older movies are much more epic than the computer generated movies they create now (with a few exceptions). It would be very interesting to see how well the Romans actually were able to rotate soldiers from front to back of the cohort during combat. It seems that it would lead to a natural giving of ground. I say this because logically it appear to be easier for the front unit to move back off the front and allow the second rank to assume the front of the formation from their current position as opposed to moving all the ranks behind moving up to fill the space of the now vacant front rank, but that is just pure speculation on my part. Would seem easier to coordinate 1 direction of movement as opposed to 2 directions while in combat nonetheless.
I think that a whole rotation of a rank in close combat like that would require a lot of coordination, perhaps it was done in several parts, first call is a cautionary the 2nd rank prepares to take over, 2nd call the formation pushes forward and the 1st rank then falls back between the shields. I've seen riot officers do something like this with gas grenades. firing, then while he reloads the 2 officers flanking him (keep in mind there are about 10 shooters) have shields and then they move forward to protecthim. then they spread apart the shields a bit. he fires, repeat.
same techniques. This could be done i'm sure. it would take alot of drilling though.
'Who Dares WINS!' - SAS
"The republic stands for truth and honour. For all that is noblest in our race. By truth and honour, principle and sacrifice alone will Ireland be free."-Liam Mellows
Who knows? If it's a enough day we may all end up Generals!"
But this would be in melee. IMHO, the biggest problem is pulling back with that huge shield and not having it get caught on anything or having to hold it in such a way that makes you unable to defend yourself. More realistically you would also have to take into consideration that it probably wasn't just the first row but the first one or two rows that were actively engaged(enemy units penetrating or being compressed). TW is a little too neat sometimes in its depiction of formation fighting.
Realistically it probably happened during lulls in battle since many types of enemies would attack in waves. So the rotation would take place between waves if the idea was to absorb each charge with fresh men while the enemy slowly wore down.
Last edited by antisocialmunky; 04-05-2009 at 12:45.
Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.
"Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009
I'm just waiting for a hint to a source for this idea of combat. Afaik it is an idea of a Italian reenactment group and strongly opposed by many others, isn't it? I think it's unlikely that it could succeed in battle. It's far better imho to reinforce with whole units. But who knows?
The queen commands and we'll obey
Over the Hills and far away.
(perhaps from an English Traditional, about 1700 AD)
Drum, Kinder, seid lustig und allesamt bereit:
Auf, Ansbach-Dragoner! Auf, Ansbach-Bayreuth!
(later chorus -containing a wrong regimental name for the Bayreuth-Dragoner (DR Nr. 5) - of the "Hohenfriedberger Marsch", reminiscense of a battle in 1745 AD, to the music perhaps of an earlier cuirassier march)
Bookmarks