Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    How much difference is their between Very Hard and Hard?

    I have been playing on "Hard" and often find myself cursing at the computer, not because it is too hard, but because it is just annoying as hell. I have had provincial cavalry fight 2 units of guard infantry for 10 full mins. It is usually the norm for AI units to fight into the single digits with "steady" morale. The AI seems to not be effected by fatigue and will charge full speed all over the map without ever getting tired. AI Cavalry charges through my infantry and keeps going full speed to another target, while if 1 of my cavalry gets touched with a pointy stick, the whole unit starts walking.

    I still win, but it takes all the fun and tactical manuevering out of the game. Trying to pair up enemy units you want to stall while looking to make a break through is pointless.

    Anyway can expect even worse crap on VH?

  2. #2
    A Livonian Rebel Member Slaists's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,828

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    Quote Originally Posted by IvarrWolfsong View Post
    How much difference is their between Very Hard and Hard?

    I have been playing on "Hard" and often find myself cursing at the computer, not because it is too hard, but because it is just annoying as hell. I have had provincial cavalry fight 2 units of guard infantry for 10 full mins. It is usually the norm for AI units to fight into the single digits with "steady" morale. The AI seems to not be effected by fatigue and will charge full speed all over the map without ever getting tired. AI Cavalry charges through my infantry and keeps going full speed to another target, while if 1 of my cavalry gets touched with a pointy stick, the whole unit starts walking.

    I still win, but it takes all the fun and tactical manuevering out of the game. Trying to pair up enemy units you want to stall while looking to make a break through is pointless.

    Anyway can expect even worse crap on VH?
    I personally gave up the H/VH battle difficulties. Something really funky is going on in those... Reminds me of RTW, where on VH cavalry could annihilate a phalanx in a frontal charge...

  3. #3
    Member Member Rufus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    332

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    I've been pretty satisfied with Hard (only played RTI so far, though). The troops on both sides tire appropriately, and morale erodes and breaks for what seem to be the right reasons - fatigue, clear mismatches in numbers or capabilities (troop/weapon types and techs such as canister shot or rank fire), or flank/rear attacks. I haven't played that much yet, but I have yet to win a battle as the underdog (not that I'm the paragon of TW tactical genius or anything). I typically win (albeit "close victories") when about evenly matched, though, especially when defending.
    An E:TW AAR on the American Revolution: The Long March of Liberty

  4. #4

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    On VH, a single firelock armed peasant unit can tear a single unit of your own line inf apart in a firefight. That same peasant forted up in a building can rip the heart out of a grenadier unit storming the building (assumign you dont have any arty to blast it apart of coruse). Enemy arty if you thought was pretty cheap on H goes even more extreme headhunting your generals or cav with every single shot.

    Overall as long as the AI fights stupid, clumps up with no reason, lacks arty, passively gets mowed by cannonballs, suicides its horse early (IE before the inf are in position to charge) you can beat em without suffering significant losses. But, heh, if he comes at you smart with a coordinated firing line or even worse cavalry charge supported by infantry push you're gonna suffer heavy losses no matter how brilliantly you fight (in other words kiss your high xp troops goodbye). Taking down the NA indians are a HUGE pain in the ass given the HUGE issues you'll have in melee with their uber Panzer cav and melee units. Without good bayonet tech, its very very very ugly.

    Also for an increased challenge if that's not masochist enough for you play on normal unit sizes. They seem to perform MUCH better on that difficulty level (dont ask me why) fighting smart most of the time, whereas on huge they tend to fight dumb alot. Higher tech also helps out the player alot, so early on its rougher.

  5. #5
    kwait nait Member Monsieur Alphonse's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Groningen
    Posts
    928

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    VH expect:

    enemy
    Sniper cannons: first round always hits
    Uber militia: were utterly destroying my elite guard units in a one on one gun duel.
    Enemy infantry can frontal assault artillery without losing much men.
    Cavalry: ignore my infantry to attack my artillery and a re bale to pass through several ranks unharmed.

    My army
    My cannons can't even hit a building except when parked right in front of it at close range. Cannister shot will often be aimed at the sky for better results ! (although I have seen one volley were a enemy unit was hit and lost 80 percent of its strength).

    The enemy gets some bonus. This results in very heavy losses during mêlée, even when defending a fortress. My very good English line infantry were losing lots of men while defending the walls. I hope that the next patch will do something about that bonus and will make the mêlée fights more realistic.
    Tosa Inu

  6. #6
    Forum Lurker Member Sir Moody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    United kingdom
    Posts
    1,630

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    from what ive observed the difficulty levels dont trigger a better AI - they hark back to the RTW days where higher diffculty ment bonus's for the enemy

    it seems the AI is getting a bonus to morale, accuracy and melee

    it makes me wonder what bonus's the AI gets for campaign difficulty (because they act the same on the campaign map from my perspective)

  7. #7

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    The only thing the difficulty setting affects is what bonus rank the AI units get. It does nothing else. This has been true since Shogun. If it's the same scale, a green VH unit is effectively rank 2. This may be more noticeable now that so much of combat is at range, being that accuracy and reload rate are both affected by unit rank (see sniper cannons).

  8. #8
    Member Member anweRU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bangor, ME
    Posts
    342

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sir Moody View Post
    it makes me wonder what bonus's the AI gets for campaign difficulty (because they act the same on the campaign map from my perspective)
    They probably get more money with increasing campaign difficulty, as in previous TW titles.

    I noticed that trade goods start out more valuable in harder difficulties. Commodity prices usually crash if I'm in a position to spam IM or dhows.
    Ancestry: Turkish & Irish. Guess my favorite factions!

  9. #9
    In the shadows... Member Vuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    R.I.P. TosaInu In the shadows...
    Posts
    5,992

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rufus View Post
    I've been pretty satisfied with Hard
    That is what my gf tells me second time around...

    (omg, I am turning into one of those sick internet trolls :P)
    Last edited by Vuk; 04-08-2009 at 07:23.
    Hammer, anvil, forge and fire, chase away The Hoofed Liar. Roof and doorway, block and beam, chase The Trickster from our dreams.
    Vigilance is our shield, that protects us from our squalid past. Knowledge is our weapon, with which we carve a path to an enlightened future.

    Everything you need to know about Kadagar_AV:
    Quote Originally Posted by Kadagar_AV View Post
    In a racial conflict I'd have no problem popping off some negroes.

  10. #10
    The longest lasting leper ever Member rossahh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    629

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ordani
    The only thing the difficulty setting affects is what bonus rank the AI units get. It does nothing else. This has been true since Shogun. If it's the same scale, a green VH unit is effectively rank 2. This may be more noticeable now that so much of combat is at range, being that accuracy and reload rate are both affected by unit rank (see sniper cannons).

    Are you so sure about that?

    Try creating a custom battle on VH between two green line infantry units, and time how long it takes that AI to reload compared to you.
    "Okay, here come the cavalry, get your swords out lads!" - the Captain details his orders to the pikemen

  11. #11

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    Honestly are you guys serious?

    The AI sucks so much I have only ever played MTW/RTWM2TW and ETW on VH/VH.

    The AI is still stupid in ETW it needs lal the help it can get.. it still does the usual sitting around and getting hit or just rushing you. Lets not complain about them getting benefits.. they need more

  12. #12
    Master Guar Herder Member Guru's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Fur trapper post
    Posts
    220

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    Well, giving the AI huge combat bonuses isn't the right way. Having a bunch of armed peasants beat your elite infantry 100-0 doesn't feel right, and it's frustrating.

    Pinky: "Gee Brain, what do you want to do tonight?"
    The Brain: "The same thing we do every night, Pinky - Try to take over the world!"

  13. #13

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vealer View Post
    Honestly are you guys serious?

    The AI sucks so much I have only ever played MTW/RTWM2TW and ETW on VH/VH.

    The AI is still stupid in ETW it needs lal the help it can get.. it still does the usual sitting around and getting hit or just rushing you. Lets not complain about them getting benefits.. they need more
    The problem is that I want a battle simulator. I don't want to win by exploiting the ais buggy programming. I want to win by using tactics and units in the way they were supposed to be used. ie I don't want to win by using my uhlans to charge to an empty corner of the map to draw off 5 line inf that can't catch them.

  14. #14
    Member Member Mr Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    In a chair
    Posts
    520

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    Quote Originally Posted by IvarrWolfsong View Post
    The problem is that I want a battle simulator. I don't want to win by exploiting the ais buggy programming. I want to win by using tactics and units in the way they were supposed to be used. ie I don't want to win by using my uhlans to charge to an empty corner of the map to draw off 5 line inf that can't catch them.
    Yup .
    7 out of 10 people like me ,
    I'm not going to change for the other three .

  15. #15

    Default Re: Difference between Very Hard and Hard?

    Yup, can agree to that too... where is this game.. Total war seems to have missed the mark.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO