Perhaps "all over" was an exaggeration. However, he has most definitely been active. I think six posts in another mafia game is sufficient proof of that.
In any case, I voted Sigurd when he had 2 votes and the leading lynch candidate had ~12. I just wanted to get Sigurd talking and said so, I was not after his actual death. I considered switching my vote off him when the bandwagon started, but I thought about it and couldn't come up with any reason to do so. I did not find anyone suspicious enough for a lynch, so Sigurd was as good a choice as any.
I find your claims that I "cheered" on the bandwagon dubious at best. I made a grand total of two posts the entire day that discussed Sigurd. The first gave my reason for voting for him, which was perfectly legitimate and made at a time when I thought there wasn't any chance he would be lynched. The second simply pointed out that he was in danger of being lynched due to lurking. The only thing it is fair to accuse me of is silence, which is perfectly true. I sat back and watched the lynch happen and was curious to see how far it would go so I said nothing. Since there are several other moderators in here who did the same thing, why are you so uppity about me in particular?
Bookmarks