Ok, I read the thread. I was tempted to slap a few people for some stupid comments, however, since I am not the Mafia and I believe TinCow isn't a Mafia member either, and the only susipicious person on CA's lsit is Tristan de Castrelreng, I will vote for him.
Vote: Tristan de Castrelreng.
Thanks Quintus. As for the whole aggressive thing, I even explained the action during the night phase, it was a tactic called "Pressure Can" in order to try to expose Stephen Asen's role, if he had one, then I stopped it and apolgoised, as I didn't actually want to OOC end up offending Stephen Asen for real.
Last edited by Beskar; 04-29-2009 at 17:01.
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
As far as I can tell neither you, Tincow or Stephen A. strikes me as guilty. However Tincow is a very experienced player capable of ever-changing playing style both as town or scum. As for you I don't see much wrong with aggressive behaviour to pressure others into making mistakes, as long as that aggressiveness remains in game. I did get annoyed with your editing tally a little bit. As for Stephen it's the first time I've played with him, can't really say much about him but I couldn't see anything solid when people bandwaggoned him and nearly got him lynched.
Retracing my vote I was considering of putting my vote on Taka, but Beefy came and out and gave a credible in his defence. So I suppose we'll concentrate on him later or Andres will just WoG him if he continues to be too busy in RL.
I don't believe this I have 3 votes for not sending in my duel score even though I did.
CA GET HERE NOW AND TELL THEM!![]()
At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.
Bookmarks