the reason behind no AI naval invasions?

**Smellycat** · 04-10-2009, 16:19

here is a pic from M2TW (i know you meant MTW and RTW just have no screenie)
that was a fun campaign btw

**Centurion1** · 04-10-2009, 21:13

I know what you're saying but the AI did (you have to admit) that they did not transport troops in the game. For instance in RTW i never once saw crete or Ireland conquered and the Greeks on Rhodes, and the Egyptians on Cyprus were never touched.

So to clarify the AI RARELY invades islands. By the way smellycat you do appear to have an entertaining campaign put together there.

**Smellycat** · 04-10-2009, 21:15

its horrible they are eating me alive

**Centurion1** · 04-11-2009, 01:58

Hmm was that normal for that campaign??? I would like to see you post a little more about it on the MTW2 section, i can't lie i am very intrigued right now.

**Sheogorath** · 04-11-2009, 20:07

Originally Posted by Smellycat

here is a pic from M2TW (i know you meant MTW and RTW just have no screenie)
that was a fun campaign btw

And that is the reason I never gave anybody military access in MTW2 or RTW.

**Smellycat** · 04-11-2009, 20:12

they never asked for it they just came

**anweRU** · 04-12-2009, 01:26

This is a METW2 discussion, but after 1.2/1.3, essentially all Med factions want to capture Ajaccio & Cagliari. Everyone from the Pope to the Egyptians will attack those two islands, and any faction hapless enough to hold them.

Back to the region trade topic:
Much to my surprise, I saw Montreal had become an Iriquois territory in my current Sweden game (stopped my Dutch campaign due to a CTD just a few turns away from victory, bugger).
When I looked again, Michigan had become French. I looked at the diplomacy screen, the two are at peace. So this is my second AI-AI property swap so far in 5-6 campaigns. Happened around 1705 too, so these things can happen any time.