Just what the hell is happening to my Babe Thread?

[Blatskiye_Suki]

Wow, guys. I'm gone for a few days and the place explodes. Most of you have not seen the pic in question, and I will gladly post it up here so everyone can see that it is NOT child pornography (with Lemur's permission), and to those who have seen it and think that it is child pornography should probably not venture outside as they will surely be scarred for life.

Nowhere in the Babe thread was there a Rules section that said "only adults should be posted", or "this thread's sole purpose is as a Viagra substitute". I posted a girl wearing a maid uniform because I thought it was cute. I did not say "masturbate to this, she's sexy." Some say I was sexualizing her, but that was never my intent. If any of you found that picture to be sexual in any way, then you are just perverts.

Now to personally address Vuk. So, I'd rather not insult you but your conclusion that my post means that I am a pedophile and watch child pornography and abuse children shows a poor grasp of logic. And that site that I (not) so subtly mentioned was the place where I suspected Sor had gotten many of his pics from, pics that were certainly of ADULTS. So it's hardly a "child pronography site".

I'm not sure what Sor posted after me, but considering what happened to me I doubt it was all that bad.

Hopefully I won't be banned just yet, as I feel I should be permitted to defend myself. I was, after all, banned before I could say anything as desert.

[Askthepizzaguy]

Wow, guys. I'm gone for a few days and the place explodes. Most of you have not seen the pic in question, and I will gladly post it up here so everyone can see that it is NOT child pornography (with Lemur's permission), and to those who have seen it and think that it is child pornography should probably not venture outside as they will surely be scarred for life.

Nowhere in the Babe thread was there a Rules section that said "only adults should be posted", or "this thread's sole purpose is as a Viagra substitute". I posted a girl wearing a maid uniform because I thought it was cute. I did not say "masturbate to this, she's sexy." Some say I was sexualizing her, but that was never my intent. If any of you found that picture to be sexual in any way, then you are just perverts.

Now to personally address Vuk. So, I'd rather not insult you but your conclusion that my post means that I am a pedophile and watch child pornography and abuse children shows a poor grasp of logic. And that site that I (not) so subtly mentioned was the place where I suspected Sor had gotten many of his pics from, pics that were certainly of ADULTS. So it's hardly a "child pronography site".

I'm not sure what Sor posted after me, but considering what happened to me I doubt it was all that bad.

edit: to be clear; I'm not trying to stifle your ability to defend yourself. The call is the Administrator's, not mine. But a ban is pointless if people can just ignore it and post under a different name, yes? I need to educate myself on forum policy, so please don't mind me.

Hopefully I won't be banned just yet, as I feel I should be permitted to defend myself. I was, after all, banned before I could say anything as desert.

Ok, so you are desert and you've been banned?

Starting a new account and posting again is ban evasion, and I believe (if I recall correctly, please correct me if I am wrong...) that this is also against the rules.

[Caius]

Starting a new account and posting again is ban evasion, and I believe (if I recall correctly, please correct me if I am wrong...) that this is also against the rules.

Havent read that. Maybe someone can give us truth?

[Askthepizzaguy]

Havent read that. Maybe someone can give us truth?

Well, I know I didn't just make it up... for some reason I am very sure. My brain doesn't invent and then subsequently believe things... lol

Ummm, I can't remember where... I even fired Tosa a PM asking where it was in the rules or if I was wrong and it's not in the rules, to be sure.

Here's the common sense reason: Getting banned means you don't post here. Starting a new account to post here renders the ban useless. That should be against the rules by default, even if it weren't explicitly stated, but I seem to recall reading that SOMEwhere...

I'm at a loss. If I knew where it said so, I'd post a quote and a link. If I am wrong, I'll sit down and shut my big fat mouth.

[Caius]

Well, I just remembered mrdun multiple accounts. Something like that?

[Askthepizzaguy]

I don't recall if multiple accounts in and of themselves are disallowed. I myself started another account or two so I could host an experimental game in the gameroom that never got off the ground.

But I do think that multiple accounts, specifically to avoid a ban, are bad news.

[The Spartan (Returns)]

For a while now, I've been wondering if I should explain myself to the ORG community. or just lurk and never post again, or just cancel my account. My reputation has been tarnished, and it's truly embarrassing to even log on here again.

I prefer petanko (delicious flat chest).

I had no intention whatsoever of even implying pedophilia in my posts. I've said this before, "I was only serving to desert's cup of tea, which was small-breasted women, and NOT anyone under 18. My posts has WOMEN in it."

Here is a post in the babe thread from February 09, 2009 by Desert.

Now, here is a sample of pictures from one of my recent posts that was entirely deleted.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Which is more appropriate?

Again all these WOMEN are over EIGHTEEN years old. Note, the breast size of these girls? They are, by today's standards, small; which was my intention of the kind of women to post.

The only picture that I admit needs deletion, was one picture with a girl with an inappropriate word on her shirt. In fact, I was again unsure, to post it or not. Like I remembered someone saying, "If you are unsure, don't post." I apologize for that.


These photos are interesting:
Aya Hirano (21)

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Nozomi Sasaki (26)

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Which one is more womanly? The one above? Or this:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

I'm sure of you could be somewhat surprised that Nozomi Sasaki is 26. Just because her size proportions (including height) are considered small in many places, is she not a woman because she's 26?

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Is she not a woman because of the face of her shape or her expression?



Is it just me or do some Japanese women, even Asians, have size proportions similar to that of a teenager?

Around the world, people have different concepts of what a woman is.

You could debate Nozomi Sasaki's womanliness (again 26):

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

But, OH. She's DEFINITELY a woman right?:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Meagan Fox (22)

Moving on...

I'll only clarify that neither patron actually posted links; theydid a "cough coughWEBSITEcough cough" that any three-year-old could see through.

This is a misunderstanding. It was only Desert that did that, not me. Desert DID mention the site saying, That he recognized some of the photos I posted, then saying, "sor-cough(SITE)cough*"


I acknowledged him, saying something like, "I recognize some of your photos as well. *coughloliconcough."
And that's all. LOLICON is not a site. It's a word. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon
Usually, people who enjoy lolicon, are pedophiles. I was pretty much calling him a pedophile. (Which can also be a false assumption)
Otherwise, I don't believe me acknowledging him, warrants any punishment towards me.

In the end, it's whether you believe me or not, which is pretty hard now that I have the ORG labeling me as a pedophile. I mean, "Why trust a pedophile?"

To those of you who have seen my posts in the babe thread prior to this incident, why would I, out of the blue, start posting implying that I enjoy pedophilia?

Just to let you guys know, it feels very degrading to be called a pedophile. I'm very offended. I'd rather kill myself, than being known as a pedophile.

[Askthepizzaguy]

None of these images seem offensive to me, personally.

I don't think you're a pedophile, especially if you never posted any underage pictures.

This incident has probably been horrible for you. I am sorry for that.

[Vuk]

For a while now, I've been wondering if I should explain myself to the ORG community. or just lurk and never post again, or just cancel my account. My reputation has been tarnished, and it's truly embarrassing to even log on here again.



I had no intention whatsoever of even implying pedophilia in my posts. I've said this before, "I was only serving to desert's cup of tea, which was small-breasted women, and NOT anyone under 18. My posts has WOMEN in it."

Here is a post in the babe thread from February 09, 2009 by Desert.

Now, here is a sample of pictures from one of my recent posts that was entirely deleted.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Which is more appropriate?

Again all these WOMEN are over EIGHTEEN years old. Note, the breast size of these girls? They are, by today's standards, small; which was my intention of the kind of women to post.

The only picture that I admit needs deletion, was one picture with a girl with an inappropriate word on her shirt. In fact, I was again unsure, to post it or not. Like I remembered someone saying, "If you are unsure, don't post." I apologize for that.


These photos are interesting:
Aya Hirano (21)

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Nozomi Sasaki (26)

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Which one is more womanly? The one above? Or this:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

I'm sure of you could be somewhat surprised that Nozomi Sasaki is 26. Just because her size proportions (including height) are considered small in many places, is she not a woman because she's 26?

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Is she not a woman because of the face of her shape or her expression?



Is it just me or do some Japanese women, even Asians, have size proportions similar to that of a teenager?

Around the world, people have different concepts of what a woman is.

You could debate Nozomi Sasaki's womanliness (again 26):

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

But, OH. She's DEFINITELY a woman right?:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Meagan Fox (22)

Moving on...


This is a misunderstanding. It was only Desert that did that, not me. Desert DID mention the site saying, That he recognized some of the photos I posted, then saying, "sor-cough(SITE)cough*"


I acknowledged him, saying something like, "I recognize some of your photos as well. *coughloliconcough."
And that's all. LOLICON is not a site. It's a word. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon
Usually, people who enjoy lolicon, are pedophiles. I was pretty much calling him a pedophile. (Which can also be a false assumption)
Otherwise, I don't believe me acknowledging him, warrants any punishment towards me.

In the end, it's whether you believe me or not, which is pretty hard now that I have the ORG labeling me as a pedophile. I mean, "Why trust a pedophile?"

To those of you who have seen my posts in the babe thread prior to this incident, why would I, out of the blue, start posting implying that I enjoy pedophilia?

Just to let you guys know, it feels very degrading to be called a pedophile. I'm very offended. I'd rather kill myself, than being known as a pedophile.

Sorblade, I do admit that I was careless, and rather unfair when using the word paedophile in the plural. I later acknowledged that in this thread and stated that I did not pay enough attention to your posts to pass a judgment on you. I apologize for using the word wrongly, however your posts were edging desert on, and I believe that you should take some responsibility for that. Also, if a girl is of age/over age :P, and you post her because she looks like she is not to serve someone's 'cup of tea', do you not think that is a problem? As I said above, I would need to see your posts again before I formed an opinion, I will trust Tosa who already has, and apologise again for a hasty judgement.

Wow, guys. I'm gone for a few days and the place explodes. Most of you have not seen the pic in question, and I will gladly post it up here so everyone can see that it is NOT child pornography (with Lemur's permission), and to those who have seen it and think that it is child pornography should probably not venture outside as they will surely be scarred for life.

Nowhere in the Babe thread was there a Rules section that said "only adults should be posted", or "this thread's sole purpose is as a Viagra substitute". I posted a girl wearing a maid uniform because I thought it was cute. I did not say "masturbate to this, she's sexy." Some say I was sexualizing her, but that was never my intent. If any of you found that picture to be sexual in any way, then you are just perverts.

Now to personally address Vuk. So, I'd rather not insult you but your conclusion that my post means that I am a pedophile and watch child pornography and abuse children shows a poor grasp of logic. And that site that I (not) so subtly mentioned was the place where I suspected Sor had gotten many of his pics from, pics that were certainly of ADULTS. So it's hardly a "child pronography site".

I'm not sure what Sor posted after me, but considering what happened to me I doubt it was all that bad.

Hopefully I won't be banned just yet, as I feel I should be permitted to defend myself. I was, after all, banned before I could say anything as desert.

With desert though, it is an entirely different story. I unfortunately remember your post all too well. As for your site, I never said it was a childpornography site (because I never visited it), I said that that is what I assumed it was and asked if I was correct.
Your cry of innocence is ridiculous. You do not, on a thread devoted to posting very sexy (and scantily clad) women post pictures of little children (in maid uniforms, and in 'provocative' positions) out of the blue because you thought it would be cute. Also, I think it would be helpful if the mods put back your post withOUT the pictures, because I am pretty sure that you said something in that post as well that was more than innocent. (I could be wrong about that, but I am pretty sure)
The people on this board are not 3 year olds desert (if we were we would have left as soon as you came on), and they are not a gullible as you may assume. Your excuse is absolute BS, and are most certainly a degenerate.

[TosaInu]

This topic will be closed for a bit. I should be back within a few hours.

[TosaInu]

Sorry,

Rl threw more towards me.

Desert.
Nowhere in the Babe thread was there a Rules section that said "only adults should be posted"

That's right, it doesn't. Like many many other things aren't said and do not need to be said.

I won't label you pedophile based on that picture, but it's serious enough to ban your desert account for it.

SorBlade15.
I won't label you pedophile either. I haven't found pictures or comments in your posts, so your account was not banned by me. I agree however with the moderators decision to give you a timeout.