Theophilus Diokletes stands.
The way I see it, gentlemen, we have three choices:
1: Let Korinthos, and the Basileus' brother, fall, while concentrating our forces on Athens
2: Try and draw the besieging army away from Korinthos by attacking Athens will full force
or
3: Combine both our armies and attempt to lift the siege on Korinthos before it is assaulted.
Personally, I do not like to think that our kingdom will abandon our loyal generals so easily. This war may take longer than we want it to, gentlemen. But is it morally right to sacrifice our friends in order to finish it quicker? Because at the moment some of you are preparing to trade Athens for Krateros' life.
Now, the way I see it is that we have a fourth choice. Or, rather, an expansion of one of our previous choices. Our armies are, for the moment, underdogs on the battlefield. Therefore we need to utilise strategy and cunning to win this war. I propose a new plan. While Antigonos' army attempts to draw the Greeks to defend Athens by besieging them there, Alexandros and his forces will march, not to Korinthos, nor Athens, but to Lakedaimon itself. With such small forces, the attack is unlikely to succeed, at least to the point where we can think of occupying Sparta. But it may be enough to shake the Spartan king now in command of the army besieging Korinthos into pulling his forces back to defend the country that has never been invaded.
It is a bold plan indeed, gentlemen, and unlikely to succeed. But it may just give us the time we need. We need all the time we can get at the moment. So, what are everyone's thoughts?
Bookmarks