I submit this article for consideration.
We need a reformation that saves Islam from foreign-inspired zealots. That reformation is already under way, with Muslims going back to the pristine teaching of the transcendent Koran, not taking on trust the hadith (a compilation of sayings of the Prophet Muhammad recorded some 250 years after his death by non-Arabs) or the corpus of medieval man-made Sharia (religious law). But because this reformation is still in its infancy, the reactionary clergy and its supporters is doing everything to strangle it.
How might secular and/or moderate societies facilitate the reformation of Islam in the manner the author suggests? One might argue it is not our problem (or rather, ought to be left to moderate Muslims) but I think most of us would agree that militant Islamism is a serious problem for us all.
Therefore, do we not have a stake in enabling the reformers and forcibly blocking those that finance and foster militancy? Would we not do well to improve the recognition that there are, in fact, many strains of Islamic thought and stop the ongoing assumptions that all Muslims are somehow in league with the militants?
Might it be possible/desirable to restrict the immigration of the largely illiterate imams, often funded by extreme regimes, from countries that exercise the depraved, politicised and dangerous forms of Islam? Could a state actively fund colleges for home-grown and moderate imams as an investment against imported extremists?
These would be two steps that I would be comfortable with, and I would be interested in constructive rebuttals and/or further suggestions. An interesting tangent would be to discuss how western societies tackle the most malign country currently festering on the face of the globe, Saudi Arabia.
Bookmarks