Re: [Tool] EDB and DS Unit Ownership Validator by RedFox
I just hope you were able to fix your problem and found the tool even a little bit useful. I'm just trying to make the world a better place here; one validator at a time...
I just found the claim that the file is corrupt as spreading incorrect information for others. Do my sarcastic comments really matter, as long as you get a new tool and learn how to use .zip files at the same time? :)
Cheers
"If you want epic, try using logic with your girlfriend."
#Complete Guide to BPI - Model INFO# #New Medium Wooden Walls#
#EDB/DS Unit Ownership Validator# #DS Name Validator#
Re: [Tool] EDB and DS Unit Ownership Validator by RedFox
Sorry, but I dont use it. I just posted in an effort to be helpfull and provide you some feedback as to why people might have an issue with it not working for them.
Next time when you do post comments like this: "It won't hurt to download the new version and not post about your inability to open a simple .zip archive."
Use a smilie at the end .. as in all honosty I did took offense the moment I read it ;)
Re: [Tool] EDB and DS Unit Ownership Validator by RedFox
Hehe, no offense was intended :P I guess I should've used a smiley indeed. Sorry for offending you - I'm used to people not making a huge deal of it and just hitting back with a good comeback like or shrug it off.. ;)
Anyways, this is getting off-topic. No need to spam the forums, now is there?
"If you want epic, try using logic with your girlfriend."
#Complete Guide to BPI - Model INFO# #New Medium Wooden Walls#
#EDB/DS Unit Ownership Validator# #DS Name Validator#
Re: [Tool] EDB and DS Unit Ownership Validator by RedFox
But I love spam ... :s
Anyway, I do suggest you add a comment to the first post saying people should make sure to use an up to date version of winrar if the archive shows anything but an .exe(?). Even if its just to prevent further discussions wether the tool works or not. I think the screenshot I posted shows enough about the confusion it can potentially cause, as you more or less already said yourself, its easy enough to unpack archives. People expect some error pop-up if its a version issue and if the archiver can unpack it its quickly seen as your tool that has the issue.
(back oftopic, no problem. As I dont really know you I could only see it as some sort of attack cause you might not be able to take the 'positive' criticism, but as I am not that easily intimidated I wasnt insulted, I only 'saw' it as somewhat offensive comment ... case closed :))
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks