Two Questions from Ye Olde EB1-er

[bovi]

#2 can't be fixed, but as I said, we should be able to enable the player to control who becomes the heir, which is something that you can't do in EB1.

To be more precise, you can in advance choose who should become the next faction heir when the current faction leader dies and the current heir becomes the leader. It appears that the authority of the characters is the sole criterion for selecting the next heir, so by giving a massive boost to authority to the one chosen by the player, it should fall on that one.

[Centurio Nixalsverdrus]

To be more precise, you can in advance choose who should become the next faction heir when the current faction leader dies and the current heir becomes the leader. It appears that the authority of the characters is the sole criterion for selecting the next heir, so by giving a massive boost to authority to the one chosen by the player, it should fall on that one.

OK, that's a workaround but not perfect either. When the king dies, you'll have to select the heir of the new king. When he's a bit younger, it's very likely that his offspring is still in childhood.

Edit: When Megas Antiochos (from my campaign ;)) finally got his son, he was already 39 years old. He got a second son with 46. I wonder what the people at CA think to disable a feature they had already programmed. Does anyone know how it is in ETW?

[Rilder]

Heh too bad (for Romans) you couldn't turn priests into "Senators" and "Vote" a new faction leader in