Originally Posted by Fragony:
If you don't mind me saying you aren't your credibility's best friend in this thread.
"How very judgmental of you! I am glad you'll side with the Neo-Nazi hate groups over me. "
Sorry but why do I deserve this?
Here:
Originally Posted by Fragony:
Yes in my humble opinion you, or at least your idea's, are more dangerous, it's the difference between a car- and a traincrash. So someone hates blacks, what's it to me, you can hate whoever you want for whatever reason, you really want to correct that? That would be imposing, and tresspassing someone's right to believe whatever the hell he wants to believe no matter how twisted it is, what is next? What else doesn't have your aproval? I consider it to be a soft variety of fascism.
You really have no idea why that is siding with Nazis over me? And if you don't mind me saying you aren't your credibility's best friend in this thread.
Originally Posted by Vuk:
I don't think that is what he is saying ATPG. Everyone has likes and dislikes, and with everyone thinks they are superior to others in some way, and that others are inferior to them and their group in some way. This can be class, nationality, gender, race, etc.
Yes, everyone is as hateful as Neo-Nazis. And it's not hate, it's just dislike. Marginal dislike, really. Actually, Nazis love everyone.
Originally Posted by
:
Think of chauvinist and feminists. Many feminists think guys are barbaric, horrible, evil, inferior beings driven by instinct and devoid of heart or feeling. (that is actually how I have heard a feminist describe men) Meanwhile chauvinists think women are nothing but unfeeling, lying, cheating, evil
who are good for nothing but sex.
Yes, but do chauvanists and feminists call for the harassment of men and women, spread pamphlets around describing how men and women aren't really people, march in mass demonstrations against men and women, threaten and intimidate women, and call for them to be segregated?
Not a good comparison.
Originally Posted by :
These people both think that the other is dangerous to their group, and that their group should have superiority.
Feminists want equality, last I heard.
Originally Posted by :
Likewise with classes, lower classes think of the rich as evil and corrupt,
Stereotyping.
Originally Posted by
:
and oppressive toward them (and they aren't far off
),
Judgmental.
Originally Posted by :
meanwhile the upper-classes/upper middle classes think of the lowers classes/lower middle classes as stupid, uneducated, inferior beings,
Stereotyping.
Originally Posted by :
who are dangerous because they cannot think for themselves and do not know what is good for them. (don't think so? Listen to two professors talking about the "six pack Joe" watching football, or here two factory workers talking about wall street investors.)
Stereotyping.
Originally Posted by :
To be honest with you, I think the most and widest spread disgust and hatred I have ever witnessed has been by higher class, educated individuals about lower class, uneducated individuals.
So are they all this way? Stereotyping.
Originally Posted by :
A similar dislike and condescension exists between religious people and atheists I believe. (by both sides to be sure)
Not by all of them. Stereotyping.
Originally Posted by :
My point is that prejudices and hates at least as strong as that of race exist in common society everywhere.
Not everywhere. And you're
whitewashing Nazism with sexual revolution; a poor argument at best.
Originally Posted by :
I do not think race is any worse than class, religious, national, or sexual hatred.
All hate is wrong.
Originally Posted by :
All have led to abuses and deaths. Some have been stronger than others through times in history. Where I person stands on these is their problem, and you may consider them stuck up and stupid, but that is hardly a reason to hate them.
Agreed.
Originally Posted by :
If these Aryan Nations people decide to abuse and kill people (or if they make it their agenda to do so), then that is something to take action against.
The vile propaganda, mass demonstrations based on hate, verbal abuse, and slander that they engage in is a form of abuse, and if there were enough Nazis in power, what would they do? Segregate. Deport. Round up and do nasty things to them, as is their stated goal. That's what makes them... Nazis.
Originally Posted by :
It is no worse though than if someone did it for race, nationality, gender, or religion though. I don't think that any of these leads to violence or oppression more than the other.
Is your entire argument based on the premise; since I am not also attacking sexists at this very moment, I must have nothing relevant to say? I am confused by what your point is.
Originally Posted by :
If you hate someone for racial prejudice, and want to do something about them, then you are gonna hate someone for national prejudice, or religious prejudice, or sexual prejudice, etc. You will end up hating the world. :P
Pardon? What the heck are you talking about? I never said I hated; I said I opposed them. Please, don't strawman me. I've been chided for strawman-ing someone here, don't do the same.
Originally Posted by :
Hate the sin, love the sinner.
I am not required to love Nazis, but I don't hate them. I hate what they stand for. If they renounce their ideology of hate, I'd be fine. I hate hatred itself. Which is kind of what you're asking me to do.... so it's pretty redundant. I still fail to see what your point is.
Originally Posted by :
I have friends who are racist.
You have friends who would march in Klan rallies or Nazi rallies and spread vile propaganda about how evil the "dark men" are? Shameful.
There is a difference between people who have quiet distrusting feelings towards black people, and those who would march in Klan rallies. It's a matter of
degree..... Nazis are hateful to an unhealthy and destructive degree, because they aren't just distrusting of black people, they think they are a lower species. Which is utterly atrocious and offensive nonsense.
Originally Posted by :
They are harmless, and do not treat people of other races poorly, but they think that they are stupid, and more instinct driven.
That's pretty shoddy treatment to write off an entire race as stupid, instinct-driven animals.
Originally Posted by :
I do not hate them for it, I instead try to use evidence to show them that they are wrong (and have succeeded with one).
The evidence is out there. It's not hard to find. People at this stage of the game who still are racist need to get themselves educated. I'll show them the information if they ask for it, but it's such basic stuff that it shouldn't even be necessary to qualify my argument against racists with evidence that races are not all a certain way, or different species. Just like in an argument about physics, one does not necessarily need to re-state the fundamentals of physics in every sentence, or even at all. It's implied that it is understood if you're talking about physics.
If someone is a racist who simply is uneducated, get educated before you open your mouth, I say. Everyone else is a hateful bigot because they should know better.
Originally Posted by :
Likewise I know women who belong to the feminist chapter at my Uni and are always talking about female empowerment, and women taking control, blah, blah, blah.
Really? They seek to establish a collective female order which dominates men? Sounds kind of sexy, actually.
A fringe lunatic or two does not tear down the philosophy of female equality (feminism). What you're talking about is an entirely different concept, which involves female superiority (sexism). Do not equate the two, they are not the same.
Originally Posted by :
They are not harmful though, and I do not hate them for it.
Good. Anecdotal evidence about non-sexists does not make one bit of difference in a discussion involving Nazis, racists, and other forms of intolerant hateful bigotry, and even if it was on-topic, anecdotal evidence does not a logical argument make.
Originally Posted by :
I do the same thing I do with racists and try to persuade them to stop being such idiots.
How condescending and judgmental to call them idiots.
Originally Posted by :
Likewise, I know people who hate Israel and hate Israelis at least as strongly as anyone I know who hates other races.
Israel is not a race. Israel is a country comprised of a large minority population of Arabs living in relative peace and harmony with a Jewish population. Your comparison is flawed.
Originally Posted by :
Once again with them, I do not hate them, but try persuade them.
No comment.
Originally Posted by :
Everyone has prejudices, but they are not violence, and they are oppression, they are just dumb.
You are whitewashing the oppression of racist hate groups like Nazis with the rest of humanity and saying it is all the same, and it is all based on being stupid.
Nazis consider non-whites to be trash and not human beings. It's possible that the rest of us non-Nazis DON'T think that way. Don't compare the rest of us to Nazis and say it is all the same. You're dead wrong because it isn't the same. No threats of violence, no hate, no intimidation, no rounding up, no deportation, no concentration camp, no lies and propaganda, no effort to reduce their rightful liberties.
Stop comparing us to Nazis. There is a difference between nazis and the rest of humanity: One is a group dedicated to wiping out or suppressing other human beings, and not all of us are like that. Stop whitewashing Nazism as being "just another prejudice based on stupidity". It is a dangerous and violent, hateful ideology bent on reducing the freedoms, equality, and liberties of decent people in this world. It must be tolerated as long as these things remain thoughts, but threats, intimidation, slander, and violence, which these groups always engage in, must never be tolerated, and all hate groups should be monitored as potential threats,
because their stated purpose is to threaten. Period.
Originally Posted by :
I think yours is a loathing of people of faith ATPG, whether you will admit it or not
If I loathe people of faith, why do I insist on speaking to them as equals and trying to convince them using reason, debate, and examples why faith can be dangerous, just as hate can be? Whether you admit it or not, you've grossly misrepresented me, Nazism, feminism, and the rest of humanity here. Is that based on loathing, or should I give you the benefit of the doubt and say it's based on bad information, not "being an idiot" which I don't think you are, but you seem to think that's what explains societies' ills.
Originally Posted by :
When people commit violence and oppress people, the fault is the violence and the violence needs to be addressed.
When people commit violence, it is not the people's fault... it is the violence's fault?
Originally Posted by :
Sure, without hatred you would not have violence
I accept this as a concession of the entire argument.
Originally Posted by :
but it IS there and cannot be gotten rid of I think.
You cannot get rid of hatred and violence but within your own heart, and try to convince others to do the same. So yes, you can get rid of violence and hate. But we all must do it voluntarily.
Saying it isn't possible; that's your opinion and it's also not accurate. It is possible to let go of hatred and violence. Many people have.
Originally Posted by :
As long as people are rational and do not let it lead to violence or oppression, that is what matters.
Is prejudice rational? Is racism rational? For that matter, you and others have argued it is OK to ignore rationalism, because embracing faith in something means rejecting or considering inferior rational argument, and embracing willfully that which cannot be proven, and accepting it as fact when it is not. That's not rational, but you advocate that. Accepting as fact that black people are a lower species, that also is irrational and requires the mind to be ignorant of the vast body of evidence accumulated to date which proves otherwise, intentional or unintentional. When a group advocates fear and intolerance of another, that is but the first step in oppression.
Originally Posted by :
If you hate the sin, and not the sinner, then you will fight the sin, and not the sinner.
You're preaching to the choir, but it is you who passed them off as being too dumb and stupid to get better. I advocated that they grow up and let prejudice go; it is you who are attacking "the sinners" themselves as being dumb and stupid. I am saying they can get better. I am asking them to get better. I am asking them to get educated and stop hating people without good reason. You're saying "oh they are just dumb".
Originally Posted by :
You fight a sinner with violence, you fight a sin with words.
My attempts to fight the sin of hatred and bigotry here with words have been called judgmental (hilariously, by people judging me as being worse than Nazis) and intolerant (hilariously, by people who think that we shouldn't tolerate someone not tolerant of intolerance) and dangerous (hilariously, by people who are defending and appeasing Nazis).
I don't know what your point is, but it's aimed at the wrong person.
Originally Posted by :
The problem is people not paying attention to that old adage.
If you say so.
Originally Posted by :
See what I mean?
Not in the slightest. I strongly disagree with everything you've said here, barring one or two sentences. But see, in spite of your arguments, I don't hate you or think you inferior to me in any way. I can disagree with you and still be your friend.
I wish you'd kindly retract the part about loathing people of faith; I don't. I have a great many on my friends list, thank you. I've dated and loved people of faith; born to faithful parents. I don't have faith because I consider it to be illogical and dangerous, and I oppose faith, but I don't hate people of faith.
Please tell me you see the difference. I oppose the actions and ideologies of people who are racist, because I oppose racism and I think it's even more dangerous. But I don't hate them, Please tell me you see the difference. Please don't pass off racism as "stupid people" because stupid people don't rally entire nations to their cause and nearly wipe out the Allies under their leadership in World War II.
Intelligent people can become racists too, and that's just as dangerous if not more, and it is NOT a harmless thing to be ignored.
Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr:
The thing is if we took a more sensible approach to racism we wouldn't need to fight it in the first place.
Yes, it is our fault racism exists, not the fault of people who choose to be racist.
Originally Posted by :
If we didn't want racism to emerge alongsied militant fascism then we shouldn't have kicked Germany in the teeth after WWI.
German Anti-semitism did NOT start after World War I. It's been around a very long time. so it did not emerge then. And the militant fascism was BASED on that racism and nationalism, both of which have been around since before WWI, and they are both dangerous and destructive.
Originally Posted by :
We would have realised that this crappy treatment
You know, crazy thought, maybe Germany shouldn't have started a war against peaceful countries and engaged in chemical warfare. I consider that to be crappy treatment.
Originally Posted by :
s what allows such nasty ideas as racism to breed in the first place.
Blaming the victim will get you nowhere.
Originally Posted by :
Get the problem at the root, racism is much more than the ramblings of some hateful people.
I never dismissed it as stupidity or mindless ramblings. I take it VERY seriously, more than you guys do apparently. I consider it to be very dangerous and wrong.
Originally Posted by :
Don't fool yourself into thinking that's all it is, that is a dangerous path to take.
Don't blame the victims, don't appease the Nazis, don't write it off as stupidity, don't ignore it, and don't say it's genetic or environmental and there's no free will involved. That is a much much much more dangerous path to take.
You guys are wrong, wrong I tells ya.

Let's take a voluntary break from this debate. You're missing my points, and I feel that yours are based on bad assumptions and self-defeating logic. As such, you probably feel the same way, and we won't make any progress today.