View Poll Results: Should BtSH end?

Voters
6. This poll is closed
  • Yes, lets cut our losses.

    3 50.00%
  • No, I want to keep playing.

    3 50.00%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 30 of 186

Thread: Should BtSH call it quits?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Dejotaros moc Praesutagos Member Cultured Drizzt fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Faerun, but when I am not insane the USA
    Posts
    3,487

    Default Re: Should BtSH call it quits?

    Here is an Idea, how about have councils of all the tribes be called if Two tribe chief call for it, like each tribe can call its own councils, but to get a council with all the tribes then two Chiefs have to agree to it.

    also for things like Economics I believe we may have to have each chief responsible for their own Income and upkeep (similar to WoTB rebels) then we can have one player be responsible for sorting out how much money each tribe gets (and if we have to use the console).


    Really I think that the system we are working out will be similar to KoTR, but with no king. And we will have to use the Personal income system of TVS. This new game will just be smashing all these features together (Each tribe will have its own income and upkeep) If we just pick and choose from those two we have the basic rule structure. Although we will have to work out how we choose each person tribe. (do we follow the family tree or allow everyone to choose the tribe they prefer)

    • So do we want to have some kind of elected position to deal with all economic issues? Or should we have each tribe elect their own?
    • Do we want some kind of dueling system? (That is going to be a B!t<h to write, with EB’s trait system.
    • We need to actually make the rankings. How much power should each chief have. How influential should Thanes be?
    • How are we going to handle the creation of new tribes? How will we allow rebellions?
    • Do we allow each chief to handle their own console work or have the GM do it?


    sorry if I sound stupid, but I think these are a few questions we need to get out of the way.
    Last edited by Cultured Drizzt fan; 07-07-2009 at 19:02.
    Micheal D'Anjou
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    memory of the short lived king of Babylon Patrokles Adiabenikos

  2. #2
    Member Member navarro951's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    California, United States
    Posts
    1,453

    Default Re: Should BtSH call it quits?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cultured Drizzt fan View Post
    Here is an Idea, how about have councils of all the tribes be called if Two tribe chief call for it, like each tribe can call its own councils, but to get a council with all the tribes then two Chiefs have to agree to it.

    also for things like Economics I believe we may have to have each chief responsible for their own Income and upkeep (similar to WoTB rebels) then we can have one player be responsible for sorting out how much money each tribe gets (and if we have to use the console).


    Really I think that the system we are working out will be similar to KoTR, but with no king. And we will have to use the Personal income system of TVS. This new game will just be smashing all these features together (Each tribe will have its own income and upkeep) If we just pick and choose from those two we have the basic rule structure. Although we will have to work out how we choose each person tribe. (do we follow the family tree or allow everyone to choose the tribe they prefer)

    • So do we want to have some kind of elected position to deal with all economic issues? Or should we have each tribe elect their own?
    • Do we want some kind of dueling system? (That is going to be a B!t<h to write, with EB’s trait system.
    • We need to actually make the rankings. How much power should each chief have. How influential should Thanes be?
    • How are we going to handle the creation of new tribes? How will we allow rebellions?
    • Do we allow each chief to handle their own console work or have the GM do it?


    sorry if I sound stupid, but I think these are a few questions we need to get out of the way.
    see this actually would be a good system. good show. again tho if were gonna put this through i will need you guys help in recruiting a larger player base.
    ~WotB~
    Strategos Epilektos Panaitolos Ankyrikos Commander of 1sy Lydian Army

    ~BtSH~

    Consul/Dux Cornelius Blasio

    X 9


  3. #3
    Dejotaros moc Praesutagos Member Cultured Drizzt fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Faerun, but when I am not insane the USA
    Posts
    3,487

    Default Re: Should BtSH call it quits?

    I think Bean had a good point when he said that this is pretty new. it is a completely different Idea to most of the other games out, and I think we should not have a huge problem recruiting from the EB forums. (perhaps Choosing Rome, the MOST hated Faction in the game, led to a problem finding Players... :p )


    (I am going to try and figure out the basics for a dueling system, in case we do want to use it. Dont expect much, I dont have the time to really go through all the traits and assign bonus's....)
    Last edited by Cultured Drizzt fan; 07-08-2009 at 00:25.
    Micheal D'Anjou
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    memory of the short lived king of Babylon Patrokles Adiabenikos

  4. #4
    Guest Azathoth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gnawing hungrily in inconceivable, unlighted chambers beyond time and space amidst the muffled, maddening beating of vile drums and the thin monotonous whine of accursed flutes.
    Posts
    783

    Default Re: Should BtSH call it quits?

    I wouldn't be able to do console work on my own.

    And what if two chiefs decide to form an alliance, or if three chiefs gang up on the remaining tribe?

    Would it be decided through PMs?

  5. #5
    Dejotaros moc Praesutagos Member Cultured Drizzt fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Faerun, but when I am not insane the USA
    Posts
    3,487

    Default Re: Should BtSH call it quits?

    That is all up to each player and Inter tribe politics are not actually Binding, so yeah go ahead and go through PM.


    It is perfectly acceptable to gang up on other tribes, but Trying to keep this alliance together is going to difficult. Most tribes are going to want to have things divided, as it means each chief will get to keep their huge amount of influence. But I can see two tribes ganging up to take on a larger tribe
    Micheal D'Anjou
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    memory of the short lived king of Babylon Patrokles Adiabenikos

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO