@Azathoth: Console use should definately be restricted, otherwise we lose control on the game. If everyone is going on adding stuff via console whenever they feel like it we'll end up with super tribes.

There will, however, always be a GM, currently Navarro (who will undoubtedly stay GM unless he's called away on tour or something). What we were discussing was how the GM was going to implement himself into the game, whether like in BtSH where Navarro ran everything, or whether it is split between all of the game officials.

@CDF: Sure, players can raid outside of the other tribes, but I still think we should have raiding inside as well. That will create a nice balance. I agree there may have to be a time period between raidings. And perhaps Navarro as GM could script some surprise forces around cities to protect them every now and again to spice things up a bit, or pay some ambushes along the way the raid is travelling.

The idea of allowing each chief to choose how they run their tribe themselves is interesting, and I wonder if it would work. How much freedom would they be allowed, because its all gotta fit in together within the game rules. Although we could have a rule section on the limitations or inexpendable points of what the tribal system must include, and chiefs can work around that, creating their own system.

I am afraid that messing around with 1.2 and RBG's is not my forte; I don't know what's going on there, so I can't help. There must be some information on it though, somewhere on the forums.

I'm gonna hop onto EB in a mo, and give people a choice on territories, factions and the like. We need to see if we can find someone with good knowledge of the system to help us move some of the eastern factions and make them German. I think that would help on the economic and diplomatic side of things in-game. If we can get one version of EB working like this, we can just copy the files that are changed and give them to everyone who wants to join the game.