What confirmed faction should not be in EBII?

[Alsatia]

Alll the Factions are great, I know, but if you had to choose, what faction would you take out in favour of a new one/which faction you hate the most/etc. I would not be surprised if there are no votes or countless flames.

(Sorry for my Reckless Spelling)

[Megas Methuselah]

You don't have to choose. There are an some 10 extra faction slots for EB2.

EDIT: Voted for the Romani, btw.

[abou]

Seleukids.

[Mediolanicus]

You get my vote for the most useless poll ever.

[Jolt]

Actually, I believe the true answer would be the Eleutheroi, but that would be impossible.

[A Very Super Market]

Yes, lets remove the eleutheroi.

[athanaric]

Yes, lets remove the eleutheroi.

I'm in.

[Cyclops]

I voted nuetral, thinking that eant Eleutheroi. I would love to see the map carpeted with playable factions and the rest unplayable Eremos.

...
EDIT: Voted for the Romani, btw.

Yeah what have they ever done for us? Apart from giving us a 20% health bonus and a 5% law bonus?

[Zett]

Yeah what have they ever done for us? Apart from giving us a 20% health bonus and a 5% law bonus?

Yes, what have they ever done for us!? Just replace them with some strong Eleutheroi stacks or something like that. Ceterum censeo Romam esse delendam.

[Cute Wolf]

Casse... they usualy just sit down and didn't got full britania, and even in alex, their landing force is effectively (often) blocked by aedui... looking one faction sit down with just one territory, and not at war with anyone is somewhat "silly" better to made them extended aedui territory tough...

Butthis was my statement only because Casse inactivity..... If U can made them more aggresive in EB II they're fine anyway...

[ray243]

Remove the Romans!

[Mediolanicus]

Casse... they usualy just sit down and didn't got full britania, and even in alex, their landing force is effectively (often) blocked by aedui... looking one faction sit down with just one territory, and not at war with anyone is somewhat "silly" better to made them extended aedui territory tough...

Butthis was my statement only because Casse inactivity..... If U can made them more aggresive in EB II they're fine anyway...

I gave the Casse 1 Belgian settlement in ~220BC
It is now 140BC (they are role played as numbers 23 and 18)



Map from this post: https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...&postcount=995

[Alsatia]

Thats a big chunk of Germania there.

Sadly, I did not consider the Eleutheroi in the poll.

Sab'yn is a waste, you rarely get to meet them and the sit and squat in that tiny corner of Arabia they got there. Nobody would want to even bother to get there because it is too far from the main field of action (Namely Greece, Italy, Asia Minor and Germany).

[bobbin]

Sab'yn is a waste, you rarely get to meet them and the sit and squat in that tiny corner of Arabia they got there. Nobody would want to even bother to get there because it is too far from the main field of action (Namely Greece, Italy, Asia Minor and Germany).

Not if you play the ptolemaioi they're not! My cities in the levant are always being attacked by the little buggers and come EB II when naval invasions will actually happen they will make holding on to the upper nile area a real pain.

[Alsatia]

Not if you play the ptolemaioi they're not! My cities in the levant are always being attacked by the little buggers and come EB II when naval invasions will actually happen they will make holding on to the upper nile area a real pain.

Ahh.... I see. Normally I play mainly European Campaigns.
Hey, what about this. What if THe EBII team got an extra faction to be with Sab'yn on the Arabic Peninsula or be on east Africa to give The Ptolemaioi EXTREME HELL!!!


Seeing you get pwned would be priceless, especially for sucessor haters.

Dont worry. You'll be fine.