What confirmed faction should not be in EBII?

[Alsatia]

Isn't it a bit stupid to argue with a member of the EB team.

Has that meant that we have made some conclusions that cannot be fully deducted from the evidence we have? Yes, such is history. Have we done so more than we have for other factions? Yes. Has that been necessary? Yes. Can we not just shift that faction slot to another area where less inferences need to be made? Possibly, but then I would also suggest that we remove Hayasdan as well. The archaelogical record (at the moment) is almost non-existent for our time-period, and as for written sources, they are contradictory, unsatisfactory and annoyingly limited.

Did you suggest that you will kick Hayasdan? Or was that an Example?



The EB Team, to my understanding, has been hit repeatedly with threats and complaints. I believe that if we let the team alone, give a few friendly suggestions, they will get thew job done faster, we can then enjoy EBII (hopefully) before 2012.

Mind you, sayng that Macedonia is rubbish (not that I am) will get a few interesting replies......