Rubicon [Concluded]

**Cultured Drizzt fan** · 05-22-2009, 01:34

Until he gives me some reason he hasn't been contributing
Unvote: abstain, Vote: Cronos Impera
I think that staying silent isn't helping anyone...

**Gaius Scribonius Curio** · 05-22-2009, 01:58

Originally Posted by Khazaar

Vote Ignoramus

I´d really like to know what the names on that Pompeius list mean...

Originally Posted by Chaotix

They're the people that Pompey wants dead, no doubt. By that logic, most of them will have either anti-mafia roles, or are Populares by faction, but I'm sure they've probably thrown a few scapegoats into the mix, too.

Caesar's been doing the same thing by mentioning players with supposedly anti-Populares sentiment in his messages.

I would assume senatores that the named people on Pompeius' list would be those he wants dead, a proscription list if you will. It could however be a massive double bluff. With regards to T. Claudius (Ignoramus) I'm fairly sure he is on the list because, because of his reveal whereby he claimed to have the ability to switch sides... (Optimate to Populares).

I for one am slightly more inclined to believe it if he has been included on Pompeius' list.

(OOC: @ Beefy: I noticed that too, maybe the person behind Pompey noticed my sig upon my entry into the game?)

**Marshal Murat** · 05-22-2009, 03:14

I figure that either Pompey will have Ignoramus killed in some form or fashion, even if he doesn't get proscribed. Ignoramus clearly has is known to have been one role and then switched to another, which either indicates Pompey's secret ability (signally investigation of roles) or Ignoramus is friends with an Optimates who realized he tried to switch to Populares. Or something like that. So really, he's dead if he survives the Proscription and if he survives the night. Just a thought.

**Iskander 3.1** · 05-22-2009, 05:58

Bedtime for me, and I won't be back til after the deadline, so...

Vote: Abstain

**Tratorix** · 05-22-2009, 08:01

Since I don't have any clue who to vote for, I will Vote: Beefy. You're unusually active so far this game.

**Cronos Impera** · 05-22-2009, 09:09

It's either me or you, Cultured Grizzt Fan.
I've made a promise to you and I'm going to keep it , no matter what.
You change your votes like I change my clothes. Even in this turn you've changed your vote once. This is a diversionary tactic.
Also, you can't investigate anything because a single senator can't investigate anything on his own. Or are you something other than a senator?

**Cronos Impera** · 05-22-2009, 09:28

Cultured Grizzd Fan has so far written 44 posts, and changed his vote 4 times in the previous round, and once in this round. This is far from an honest effort, I belive.

**Askthepizzaguy** · 05-22-2009, 09:53

Originally Posted by Cronos Impera

Also, you can't investigate anything because a single senator can't investigate anything on his own. Or are you something other than a senator?

Actually, some senators have that ability. It's a weak and useless ability, but they do have it.

**Beefy187** · 05-22-2009, 13:16

Originally Posted by Tratorix

Since I don't have any clue who to vote for, I will Vote: Beefy. You're unusually active so far this game.

Or maybe everyone else is unusually inactive.
I usually make it in the top 5.

For the sake of better game, I suggesting lynching off semi lurkers. This should raise the activity and we'll get more to refer to in the later game. Nothing worse then letting a lurker win..

And I checked the activity.. I'm on the middle..