Rubicon [Concluded]

[Cronos Impera]

<>
FoS:Clutured Drizzed Fan

[Cultured Drizzt fan]

why don't you vote for me then? I am sorry Cronos Impera, but could you explain?

[Cultured Drizzt fan]

ok then FOS: Cronos Impera. Why so cloak and dagger? you show up to post once and don't ever defend your choice. It seems strange to me, and counter productive. It seems quite suspicious to me . I am almost tempted to vote for you, but I will wait and see what you have to say.

[AggonyDuck]

Better get some sort of vote in before going to bed.

Vote: Cronos Impera

[Cultured Drizzt fan]

Until he gives me some reason he hasn't been contributing
Unvote: abstain, Vote: Cronos Impera
I think that staying silent isn't helping anyone...

[Gaius Scribonius Curio]

Vote Ignoramus

I´d really like to know what the names on that Pompeius list mean...

They're the people that Pompey wants dead, no doubt. By that logic, most of them will have either anti-mafia roles, or are Populares by faction, but I'm sure they've probably thrown a few scapegoats into the mix, too.

Caesar's been doing the same thing by mentioning players with supposedly anti-Populares sentiment in his messages.

I would assume senatores that the named people on Pompeius' list would be those he wants dead, a proscription list if you will. It could however be a massive double bluff. With regards to T. Claudius (Ignoramus) I'm fairly sure he is on the list because, because of his reveal whereby he claimed to have the ability to switch sides... (Optimate to Populares).

I for one am slightly more inclined to believe it if he has been included on Pompeius' list.

(OOC: @ Beefy: I noticed that too, maybe the person behind Pompey noticed my sig upon my entry into the game?)

[Marshal Murat]

I figure that either Pompey will have Ignoramus killed in some form or fashion, even if he doesn't get proscribed. Ignoramus clearly has is known to have been one role and then switched to another, which either indicates Pompey's secret ability (signally investigation of roles) or Ignoramus is friends with an Optimates who realized he tried to switch to Populares. Or something like that. So really, he's dead if he survives the Proscription and if he survives the night. Just a thought.

[Iskander 3.1]

Bedtime for me, and I won't be back til after the deadline, so...

Vote: Abstain

[Tratorix]

Since I don't have any clue who to vote for, I will Vote: Beefy. You're unusually active so far this game.

[Cronos Impera]

It's either me or you, Cultured Grizzt Fan.
I've made a promise to you and I'm going to keep it , no matter what.
You change your votes like I change my clothes. Even in this turn you've changed your vote once. This is a diversionary tactic.
Also, you can't investigate anything because a single senator can't investigate anything on his own. Or are you something other than a senator?

[Cronos Impera]

Cultured Grizzd Fan has so far written 44 posts, and changed his vote 4 times in the previous round, and once in this round. This is far from an honest effort, I belive.

[Andres]

I thought I was the only one having a couple of days off+splendid weather. Come on guys, you need to talk more

I for one am going to Unvote : Sasaki.

It's a bit unfair to vote someone for having a certain reputation

[Beskar]

Vote for him for killing me off then. :p

[Andres]

Vote for him for killing me off then. :p

Are you certain he killed you?

EDIT: or are you referring to Swords in the Moon?

[Askthepizzaguy]

Also, you can't investigate anything because a single senator can't investigate anything on his own. Or are you something other than a senator?

Actually, some senators have that ability. It's a weak and useless ability, but they do have it.

[Cultured Drizzt fan]

Cultured Grizzd Fan has so far written 44 posts, and changed his vote 4 times in the previous round, and once in this round. This is far from an honest effort, I belive.

you are in fact correct, I changed my vote four times. I am very wishy washy, if you come up with a good enough reason for me not to vote for you then I will probably switch my vote. that just happened to happen in the last round, I believed that I had found the right person three times, but each had a very good argument for why they should not be lynched, (or had a very stirring speech), you did not, even now you are not coming up with any good reasons we shouldn't lynch you and be done with it. if you do then please say them, I am listening.

[Ignoramus]

Vote: Abstain

[Captain Blackadder]

Vote Ignoramus

Voting abstain at this point is a foolish course of action. Vote for someone and I will remove the vote.

Anyway personally I feel that Cronus is most certainly scum

[Cronos Impera]

I only defend myself with great, stirring speeches only when I am mafia or when I am Mafia AND winning.But now I'm neither Mafia nor winning. A townie roll is blinding for me and I can't choose a side. Therefore I am doing such a poor job....and not voting or killing pevergreen as I did the previous roles.
I always kill pevergreen first when I am Mafia, or pointing fingers at him for whatever reason. That is revenge for him voting for me during my first Mafia game. I never recovered from that humiliating defeat.

I won the Brothel and if you are looking for evidence of any suspicious behaviour you can go into my Brothel record.

[Chaotix]

A tally would be useful... because then I would know if I'm still in danger of dying here.

I am surprised at the lack of activity. Had there been more posts, I would have found myself responding to more of them.

[Beefy187]

Since I don't have any clue who to vote for, I will Vote: Beefy. You're unusually active so far this game.

Or maybe everyone else is unusually inactive.
I usually make it in the top 5.

For the sake of better game, I suggesting lynching off semi lurkers. This should raise the activity and we'll get more to refer to in the later game. Nothing worse then letting a lurker win..

And I checked the activity.. I'm on the middle..

[Jolt]

Correct Tally (I think):

Chaotix: 1 (Sasaki)
Andres: 2 (Chaotix, YLC)
Sasaki: 2 (w&f, ATPG)
YLC: 1 (khaan)
Ignoramus: 2 (Khazaar, Capt. Blackadder)
Cronos Imperia: 2 (AggonyDuck, CulturedDrizztfan)
Beefy: 1 (Traorix)

Abstain: 6 (Splitpersonality, GSC, Jolt, Andres, Iskander 3.1, Ignoramus)

[Jolt]

Correct Tally (I think):

Chaotix: 1 (Sasaki)
Andres: 2 (Chaotix, YLC)
Sasaki: 2 (w&f, ATPG)
YLC: 1 (khaan)
Ignoramus: 2 (Khazaar, Capt. Blackadder)
Cronos Imperia: 2 (AggonyDuck, CulturedDrizztfan)
Beefy: 1 (Traorix)

Abstain: 6 (Splitpersonality, GSC, Jolt, Andres, Iskander 3.1, Ignoramus)

[TinCow]

Andres: 2 (Chaotix, YLC)
Sasaki: 2 (w&f, ATPG)
Ignoramus: 2 (Khazaar, Capt. Blackadder)
Cronos Imperia: 2 (AggonyDuck, Cultured Drizzt fan)

Chaotix: 1 (Sasaki)
YLC: 1 (khaan)
Beefy187: 1 (Tratorix)

Abstain: 7 (Splitpersonality, Gaius Scribonius Curio, Jolt, Andres, Iskander 3.1, Ignoramus, Marshal Murat)

Not Voting: 10 (Greyblades, LittleGrizzly, johnhughthom, Ichigo, atheotes, TheFlax, Caius, Beefy187, Cronos Imperia, everyone)

[Greyblades]

Yeah yeah...
Vote: Beefy.

[TinCow]

Yeesh...

I am leaving shortly after the deadline expires (in about an hour) and will not be back until several hours later. I am NOT going to lynch 5 people at once, so if the time limit expires with the voting still tied, voting will continue until I can get back online in the early afternoon. Whenever I get back online, whoever is leading at that point will be lynched without warning.

[Ignoramus]

Vote Ignoramus

Voting abstain at this point is a foolish course of action. Vote for someone and I will remove the vote.

Anyway personally I feel that Cronus is most certainly scum

Alright.

Unvote: Abstain
Vote: Cronus

[johnhughthom]

Vote: Sasaki

Um, because.... I think he's mafia.

[Captain Blackadder]

UNVOTE Ignoramus

Vote Cronus

[Beefy187]

Vote: Cronos

Seems like the best option we have.