Rubicon [Concluded]

**Iskander 3.1** · 05-29-2009, 22:38

Split was supposed to be part of a protection group that I organized but in his defense his message from me wasn't marked as read until it was too late to do anything.

**Splitpersonality** · 05-29-2009, 22:58

Again, I apologize... I checked the message in school this morning, way after the date.

**Andres** · 05-29-2009, 23:54

Originally Posted by Chaotix

Nope, I have no cover pm to show you, but I cannot say the same for the mafia, as I am not technically one of them. They could have cover roles, or they could have investigation defense, which is one thing that I do have.

As for actions, I was blocking LittleGrizzly again- he can vouch for this, I suppose. He had guards again and there were still two kills, so I suppose that means he's really a Consul.

What do you mean with "I am not technically one of them"?

**TheFlax** · 05-30-2009, 00:03

Originally Posted by Andres

What do you mean with "I am not technically one of them"?

Chaotix is some sort of quintuple agent, who's side is he really on?

He alluded to so many things, I'm simply not sure anymore.

**Splitpersonality** · 05-30-2009, 00:11

He's saying he has no cover role, but he's not sure if the mafia has them because he's not mafia :|

**Andres** · 05-30-2009, 00:22

Originally Posted by TheFlax

Chaotix is some sort of quintuple agent, who's side is he really on?

He alluded to so many things, I'm simply not sure anymore.

He claims role blocker. Rules don't say anything about a role blocker... Could be one of the secret roles, but there's more:

Originally Posted by Chaotix

I was blocking LittleGrizzly again- he can vouch for this, I suppose. He had guards again and there were still two kills, so I suppose that means he's really a Consul.

If he blocked LittleGrizzly then how could LittleGrizzly have ordered his lictors to protect him? This doesn't add up. If LittleGrizzly truly would have been blocked, then his protection would have failed.

LittleGrizzly, do the results of your night action mention anything unusual that hints towards the blocking of your night action?

Has Chaotix ever been ordered to block a townie from the townie groups, just to check his claim? Otherwise, he has the perfect fake role for being active at night: solo character doesn't need to be in a group...

**Splitpersonality** · 05-30-2009, 01:18

Being blocked may allow him to see the abilities of whomever he is blocking, and possibly to accept it into his own. Sort of like how the woman at the beginning "blocked" whomever they blocked (my memory is hazy), maybe he blocks through a personal relation with the target.

This would explain why other actions would continue in someone's place, someone being blocked that is.

**Chaotix** · 05-30-2009, 05:10

Originally Posted by Andres

He claims role blocker. Rules don't say anything about a role blocker... Could be one of the secret roles, but there's more:

If he blocked LittleGrizzly then how could LittleGrizzly have ordered his lictors to protect him? This doesn't add up. If LittleGrizzly truly would have been blocked, then his protection would have failed.

LittleGrizzly, do the results of your night action mention anything unusual that hints towards the blocking of your night action?

Has Chaotix ever been ordered to block a townie from the townie groups, just to check his claim? Otherwise, he has the perfect fake role for being active at night: solo character doesn't need to be in a group...

My blocking ability also has the added effect that if a player has guards assigned to him (and only in that way, I've discovered) I am able to share that player's guards for the night. From experience blocking other Praetors or Consuls, I've learned that if they try to send their guards to someone else, I do wind up blocking that. It's kind of like a double edged sword.

If you want, I can block a player who's using a group action tonight- just make sure that the group has only enough people so that if I block one person then it fails, if you want proof. Also, you may want to make sure it won't result in someone getting killed.

That, and I'd like to be protected myself if I'm going to do that, if possible. Mentioning that I'm going to block someone without guards is kind of like a death sentence if either mafia family wants to kill me, and my goal is to survive.

**Iskander 3.1** · 05-30-2009, 05:58

I'm going to be away for the next 24 hours or so, therefore I shall Vote: Abstain

**Beefy187** · 05-30-2009, 01:48

Spoiler Alert, click show to read:

Who ever Caesar is... He has sense of humour

And good knowledge of Roman history to crack out a Roman joke

**LittleGrizzly** · 05-30-2009, 02:11

I am told by my night results that I am well gaurded but they let the woman in...

My theory is my orders don't get blocked... as im simply telling my troops to stand gaurd... but if i tried to participate in some group action the block would be effective...

Thats the impression i get from my night results...