Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 32

Thread: Optimum Population Trust

  1. #1
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default Optimum Population Trust

    'The Optimum Population Trust believes that Earth may not be able to support more than half its present numbers before the end of this century, and that the UK's long-term sustainable population level may be lower than 30 million. Research and policy are summarised on this website'

    I had never heard of he above organisation. They gained my attention, because they gained a very prominent patron: Sir David Attenborough, famous naturalist, a man whom I adore.

    Sir David Attenborough said yesterday that the growth in global population was frightening, as he became a patron of an organisation that campaigns to limit the number of people in the world. The television presenter and naturalist said that the increase in population was having devastating effects on ecology, pollution and food production.

    “There are three times as many people in the world as when I started making television programmes only a mere 56 years ago,” he said, after becoming a patron of the Optimum Population Trust (OPT) think-tank. “It is frightening. We can’t go on as we have been. We are seeing the consequences in terms of ecology, atmospheric pollution and in terms of the space and food production.

    “I’ve never seen a problem that wouldn’t be easier to solve with fewer people, or harder, and ultimately impossible, with more. Population is reaching its optimum and the world cannot hold an infinite number of people,” Sir David, who has two children, said.
    I'll use the questions of the organisation itself as a starter for debate: 'Concerned about the speed of global warming? About food, water and energy scarcity - the effects of overpopulation on a plundered planet?'

    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  2. #2
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    “I’ve never seen a problem that wouldn’t be easier to solve with fewer people, or harder, and ultimately impossible, with more.
    Hmm... isn't the opposite usually true? This sounds like a lot of nonsense. Sure, the world can't support an infinite population, but I don't think we're near that threshold yet.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  3. #3
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    If we had a few massive wars every once in a while we wouldn't have this problem. Out of all the posts that hurt any political aspirations I may have the most, this is probably it.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    “I’ve never seen a problem that wouldn’t be easier to solve with fewer people, or harder, and ultimately impossible, with more. Population is reaching its optimum and the world cannot hold an infinite number of people,” Sir David, who has two children, said.
    Many problems easier to solve with more people...like "let's build this bridge". Quote out of context?

    The native population of western countries is evening out/declining. So...we aren't going on as we have been. Improvements in technology increase the number of people the earth can support, and as countries become richer people stop having as many kids.

    There's no doomsday scenario here.

  5. #5
    Oni Member Samurai Waki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Portland, Ore.
    Posts
    3,925
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Populations rise and fall, its quite a historically ordinary thing. We're at a point right now, that technologically speaking, we can support the numbers we do. Though it may be that only a fraction of that population live as well as most of the people here at the .org do. Eventually, somethings going to happen either biologically or technologically that will reduce the population, whether it be a massive disease, war, famine, or Cataclysm. The other side of the fence is that if technology sustains at the rate that we are producing, the eventuality of people physically leaving earth may also come about, though not in the near future.

    These things are best argued with reason, no need to panic. Perhaps, we do need to limit the number of children people have, but the counter argument is whether thats worth sacrificing our moral fiber. Personally, I'd choose extinction.

  6. #6
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Quote Originally Posted by Xiahou View Post
    Hmm... isn't the opposite usually true?
    Yes, with government being the notable exception.

  7. #7
    Spirit King Senior Member seireikhaan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Iowa, USA.
    Posts
    7,065
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Quote Originally Posted by Xiahou View Post
    Hmm... isn't the opposite usually true? This sounds like a lot of nonsense. Sure, the world can't support an infinite population, but I don't think we're near that threshold yet.
    How can we know what the threshold is?

    Find out when we get there?

    EDIT: Its pretty easy for us in the comfy west to say we haven't hit it. I imagine a Bangladesh(y?)(ese?)(ian?) might have a different view.
    Last edited by seireikhaan; 05-05-2009 at 01:52.
    It is better to conquer yourself than to win a thousand battles. Then, the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.

  8. #8
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Look up Thomas Malthus and how wrong he was. The Human mind is the greatest asset we have. It literally creates wealth and sustinence seemingly out of thin air. More people are the answer, not less
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  9. #9
    Spirit King Senior Member seireikhaan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Iowa, USA.
    Posts
    7,065
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Quote Originally Posted by TuffStuffMcGruff View Post
    Look up Thomas Malthus and how wrong he was. The Human mind is the greatest asset we have. It literally creates wealth and sustinence seemingly out of thin air. More people are the answer, not less
    Sweet, now I get to quote one of my favorite cartoons.

    "Humankind can not obtain anything without first sacrificing something.
    In order to obtain anything something of equal value is required."

    Sure, we can turn seeds into wheat, wheat into beer, corn into oil, rocks into valuable metals. Yet there still comes a point when we must stand up to the fact that there is only so far we can stretch the limit. We've stretched it very, very far. Can we stretch it further? I honestly doubt it.

    Want some proof? Go research what extensive over-agriculture has done to the top soil in the American midwest. Unless we reverse course in our agricultural practices, we shall run the soil, at least temporarily, barren.
    Last edited by seireikhaan; 05-05-2009 at 02:08.
    It is better to conquer yourself than to win a thousand battles. Then, the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.

  10. #10
    Member Member Alexander the Pretty Good's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    4,979

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Science got us into some of these messes, science will get us out.

  11. #11
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Quote Originally Posted by TuffStuffMcGruff View Post
    Look up Thomas Malthus and how wrong he was. The Human mind is the greatest asset we have. It literally creates wealth and sustinence seemingly out of thin air. More people are the answer, not less
    Maybe he will be right, he didn't take improvements in agriculture into the equation and these were a major factor in the 19th century, doesn't prove his theory wrong.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Senior Member naut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    9,103

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Condoms?

    But seriously, there probably are way too many people, and have been for the last Century or so. Another large-scale war, famine, disease, global warming, scientific breakthrough and it'll reach equilibrium again.
    Last edited by naut; 05-05-2009 at 12:06.
    #Hillary4prism

    BD:TW

    Some piously affirm: "The truth is such and such. I know! I see!"
    And hold that everything depends upon having the “right” religion.
    But when one really knows, one has no need of religion. - Mahavyuha Sutra

    Freedom necessarily involves risk. - Alan Watts

  13. #13
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Quote Originally Posted by Shinseikhaan View Post
    EDIT: Its pretty easy for us in the comfy west to say we haven't hit it. I imagine a Bangladesh(y?)(ese?)(ian?) might have a different view.
    Bangladesh has more problems than overpopulation. There are parts of the world with much higher pop. densities that are quite prosperous.

    Have a look at this:
    The idea that global populations levels are too high and must therefore be stabilized has been embraced by policymakers and opinion formers all over the world, from the UN to Al Gore. But there is no evidence to support this.

    This report from demographic expert Nicholas Eberstadt shows how global living standards have improved dramatically all over the world over the past century despite a near-quadrupling of human numbers – and they can continue to improve at current and future population levels.

    The concept of ‘overcrowding’ is widely misunderstood, conjuring images of hungry children, unchecked disease, squalid living conditions and teeming slums. These conditions are more properly termed as ‘human poverty’. In reality, there is no link between population and density– wealthy Monaco, for example, has a population density forty times greater than Bangladesh.

    Quote Originally Posted by Shinseikhaan
    Want some proof? Go research what extensive over-agriculture has done to the top soil in the American midwest. Unless we reverse course in our agricultural practices, we shall run the soil, at least temporarily, barren.
    Before we implement breeding controls, maybe we should stop turning corn into fuel. What a boondoggle that's been on pretty much every level....
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  14. #14
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Heaven knows I won't be contributing to over-population.

    One brat should be more than enough...
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  15. #15
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Wink Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Heaven knows I won't be contributing to over-population.
    We all know that Horetore...

  16. #16
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Quote Originally Posted by Fragony View Post
    We all know that Horetore...
    Awwww.... It hurts when you say stuff like that, Frags
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  17. #17
    Horse Archer Senior Member Sarmatian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Novi Sad, Serbia
    Posts
    4,315

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    How are they calculating this? How can UK be able to support 60 millions now and only 30 millions long-term?

  18. #18
    Darkside Medic Senior Member rory_20_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Taplow, UK
    Posts
    8,690
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    This often comes down to what one wants from the earth.

    These people often wants masses of untouched countryside where they can go and see the Beauty of Nature:

    1. Dartmoor - man made by deforestation
    2. Norfolk Broads - man made by drainage


    Etc etc.

    Of course in previous times such people would buy massive estates to keep the rabble away from them. Since there is increased right of way this is not an option. So best we cull the lot of them.

    Yes, it's always seems to be them. I've never heard of these types not having any children or killing themselves. After all these changes are to make the planet nicer for them to appreciate.

    I am based in London. I am used to the high density of people. I find this normal and acceptable. I like the parks. If you were to work out the square footage of each person it would be minute, but by sharing we all can use these pleasant spaces. Optimum is only true for the assumptions one has made beforehand.

    An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
    Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
    "If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
    If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill

  19. #19
    Master of Few Words Senior Member KukriKhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,415

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    It's true: if you stick around long enough, you get to see everything twice*, or even 3 times. I remember 1974... Zero Population Growth was all the rage. Same song, slightly different tempo.

    I think rory is onto something: in the early 70's, the mantra was all: "Let's get back to the land, have only 1.4 kids, and set our souls free!". But the guys saying that (despite their strategically-torn bell-bottom pants and 'can't afford a haircut' long hair) were well-to-do, and could afford that Colorado acreage they longed for - with the side benefit of keeping the riff-raff at arm's length.

    *just don't expect to see me in a lime-green "Leisure Suit" when you come visit me at the Shady Rest Retirement Home and House of Euthanasia tm, 20 years hence. ~K.
    Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.

  20. #20
    Poll Smoker Senior Member CountArach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    9,029

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars View Post
    If we had a few massive wars every once in a while we wouldn't have this problem. Out of all the posts that hurt any political aspirations I may have the most, this is probably it.
    Yeah I can't see that helping
    Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
    Nothing established by violence and maintained by force, nothing that degrades humanity and is based on contempt for human personality, can endure.

  21. #21
    Spirit King Senior Member seireikhaan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Iowa, USA.
    Posts
    7,065
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Quote Originally Posted by Xiahou View Post
    Bangladesh has more problems than overpopulation. There are parts of the world with much higher pop. densities that are quite prosperous.

    Have a look at this:
    Monaco can afford that population density because it doesn't have to feed itself- large scale agriculture, meatpacking, and fishing from other countries do that for them because they can afford to pay. If every country had that sort of population density, there wouldn't be any room left to actually grow the food to feed it. In other words, Monaco's position is one of pure luxury, not one of practicality for the other countries. Further, if other countries did end up with that sort of density, other nations would practically be forced into ag specialization to provide affordable food. That leads to the sort of bollox that the midwest is doing- squeezing out every drop of corn/wheat/soy etc... with little regard for what that sort of practice doest to the soil long term. Its literally not sustainable- the land will eventually dry up on you. All the fertilizer in the world can still only extend shelf life for so long.

    Before we implement breeding controls, maybe we should stop turning corn into fuel. What a boondoggle that's been on pretty much every level....
    Well, that would be a start.
    Last edited by seireikhaan; 05-05-2009 at 14:52.
    It is better to conquer yourself than to win a thousand battles. Then, the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.

  22. #22
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Quote Originally Posted by Xiahou View Post
    Before we implement breeding controls, maybe we should stop turning corn into fuel. What a boondoggle that's been on pretty much every level....
    Nonsense. What we should stop doing, however, is stop making fuel instead of fuel. There's plenty of left-overs after we've grown our food, however, so it really shouldn't be much of a problem.

    But there really is no denying, that the fewer we are, the richer we are. The resources are the same no matter what we do, we can only change the number of people using them.

    Of course, killing people or forcing people to stop having children is barbaric. But there's no sense in encouraging people to breed. I hear the doomsdayers say that unless we europeans start breeding, our economy will crumble because we will be too few people. Nonsense I say, we'll just import a few million refugee's, problem solved! And as an additional bonus, it'll lower the percentage of hillbilly Norwegians in this country! Double win!

    The concept of ‘overcrowding’ is widely misunderstood, conjuring images of hungry children, unchecked disease, squalid living conditions and teeming slums. These conditions are more properly termed as ‘human poverty’. In reality, there is no link between population and density– wealthy Monaco, for example, has a population density forty times greater than Bangladesh.
    What a retard. Comparing a retreat for rich tax-refugee's with a third world country? What is the guy on, honestly?
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  23. #23
    Darkside Medic Senior Member rory_20_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Taplow, UK
    Posts
    8,690
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    A jungle or a desert may have a low density of people, but no one is rich. There needs to be enough people in a given area to undertake tasks that are required by society - OK, we now can offload menial work to robots to get the density down.

    Please don't get me wrong, the density in Monaco isn't sustainable to feed itself, but a city could be able to produce a lot of food itself if there was the desire to do so: the top of buildings, garden boxes, even hydroponics and channelled light could all be used, as could vertical farms where each level of a skyscraper is a greenhouse. Gardens and allotments are easier, simpler options.

    As has been also mentioned, the amount of food that is wasted runs at c. 30% (including that from restaurants and past sell by date food). That's a massive amount of wasted time and energy. Acres would be freed up by just not doing this. And if we only ate close to the amount we needed...

    An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
    Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
    "If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
    If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
    The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill

  24. #24
    Horse Archer Senior Member Sarmatian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Novi Sad, Serbia
    Posts
    4,315

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Nonsense. What we should stop doing, however, is stop making fuel instead of fuel. There's plenty of left-overs after we've grown our food, however, so it really shouldn't be much of a problem.

    But there really is no denying, that the fewer we are, the richer we are. The resources are the same no matter what we do, we can only change the number of people using them.
    It's technological advancement that makes us rich. We're richer now than we've been in middle ages and those living in middle ages were richer than those living in the stone age.

    I can see mining asteroids and other planets much much before we use up resources on earth...

  25. #25
    Old Town Road Senior Member Strike For The South's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Between Louis' sheets
    Posts
    10,369

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    More crowding=Better chance to cop a feel. I see no downside.
    There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford

    My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.

    I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.

  26. #26
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    But there really is no denying, that the fewer we are, the richer we are. The resources are the same no matter what we do, we can only change the number of people using them.
    The filthy rich have never been richer and the standards of living in developed countries has only increased as population grew.



    What a retard. Comparing a retreat for rich tax-refugee's with a third world country? What is the guy on, honestly?
    The point, which you haven't been able to refute, was that high population density does not equal poverty. High population density is no better an indicator of poverty than low population density is a measure of wealth. In both cases, it's a poor indicator.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  27. #27
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default Re : Optimum Population Trust

    Humans will be alright, one way or another, if only in a bleak, Bladerunner-like dystopia.

    B..but what of our poor cuddly and furry friends with whom we share our world?

    In the simplest terms, when a habitat is destroyed, the plants, animals, and other organisms that occupied the habitat have a reduced carrying capacity so that populations decline and extinction becomes more likely.[2] The single greatest threat to species worldwide is the loss of habitat.[3] Temple (1986) found that 82% of endangered bird species were significantly threatened by habitat loss. Habitat destruction is the primary cause of loss of biodiversity.
    Last edited by Louis VI the Fat; 05-05-2009 at 20:12.
    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  28. #28
    Member Member Alexander the Pretty Good's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    4,979

    Default Re: Re : Optimum Population Trust

    Hopefully a little genetical engineering will go a long way.

  29. #29
    Nobody expects the Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin Death Trip
    Posts
    15,754

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    I've heard some disturbing rumors about soylent green.

  30. #30
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Optimum Population Trust

    Quote Originally Posted by Xiahou View Post
    The filthy rich have never been richer and the standards of living in developed countries has only increased as population grew.

    The point, which you haven't been able to refute, was that high population density does not equal poverty. High population density is no better an indicator of poverty than low population density is a measure of wealth. In both cases, it's a poor indicator.
    Completely irrelevant, as is the argument that we're richer now than we were in the middle ages. We're richer now because we have accumulated more knowledge, which in turn has made us better at exploiting resources. You can't compare a time when we were fewer(like say the middle ages) and the present. You've got to ask; what would the situation be if we were 5 billion humans instead of 6 billion now?

    And the answer to that, is that we would've been richer with 5 billion. The amount of resources would've been the same, and we would be able to extract just as much resources. Nothing would've changed except for the number of people to split the wealth on, and, unless you failed maths, should tell you that we would've been richer with 5 billion.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO