So, two Gay parents can be good? And they deserve equal rights as everyone else? And I suppose the same goes for Bisexual people and transgendered people as well? My my my we are a bastion of progressive thought today. I am glad we've made progress.
At the end of the day, many straight people can't have a baby together, and being gay does not make you sterile. Plenty of gay people have children. Such is life.At the end of the day, they aren't. Two men cannot have a baby together, nor two women. Such is life.
The only purpose of marriage is to contain heterosexual activity for the protection of childen.
To be blunt marriage is about preventing bastardry.
Spoken like a true romantic.It has nothing to do with pleasure, or love, or any of that dross.
That's not what the law says. Are you making this stuff up on the spot?Marriage is the legal sanction to bear ans raise offsping, and it is entered into before the bearing, not after.
I note that the people clamoring for the sanctity of marriage have a very low opinion of the sacred institution of marriage, and believe it only applies to hypothetical and rare circumstances such as both people being virgins (and therefore childless), being together only for the purposes of dropping children out of vaginas, and staying together forever.So I suppose that makes marriage completely irrelevant today.
Some people have crazy ideas about two people being together because they want to be together, out of love, regardless of being old, or infertile, or not being virgins, etc... and that if their partner is an abusive child molesting drunk who ends up in jail for example they should be able to get a divorce from that partner.
Common sense stuff. You know, the world doesn't exist as a fantasy page where everyone lives a fairy tale. Real marriage exists in the real world where sometimes, people aren't virgins, or don't want children, or love each other. Imagine!
The more those who oppose gay marriage talk about the sanctity of traditional marriage, the more they invent a fictional "traditional marriage" that almost no one actually has. If they want to run off and join an Amish community where stuff like that actually happens, be my guest. Until then; it's the real world and people don't match the fantasy. That fantasy marriage is fine, but it is no better or holier than any other marriage.
Yes but they usually have those children with women, in which case you've just got to go with the court proceedings and do the best you can.
When you think of homosexuals, I take it that you don't picture women very often. Is it really the fear of another man touching you that drives your arguments?
Women are homosexuals sometimes too, and many of them attempt to be heterosexual due to societal pressure, and have children. Or maybe they are bisexual and they have relations with men at times. Or maybe they are willing to have babies the natural way regardless of their leanings. And gay men end up fathers.
"Go with the court proceedings..." what do you mean? Do you want to take children away from gays?
Bookmarks