Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: should CA disable diplomacy altogether in ETW?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    A Livonian Rebel Member Slaists's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,828

    Unhappy should CA disable diplomacy altogether in ETW?

    The way it stands now the player is the only faction that is able to make peace. If an AI factions declares a war on another AI faction: it's a 100-year war. By mid-game, pretty much everyone is at war with everyone else ruining AI economy to the point that in late mid game, the AI is bankrupt to do anything meaningful (read: fun) militarily.

    So, should CA disable diplomacy altogether since they seem unable to implement it in a meaningful fashion? OK, maybe they should leave the trade part in, but that is heavily favoring the player now anyway.

    Alternatively: the player should make a house rule NOT TO make peace with any AI enemies. That seems to be the only way to keep things reasonably challenging post mid-game (on VH vanilla).
    Last edited by Slaists; 05-08-2009 at 14:57.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO