It's an irrelevant argument to me. I never had any doubt that the man provided some percentage of "abortions" to terminate a non-viable pregnancy. If that were all he performed, a lot of people would likely have viewed him more kindly. However, his practice also provided and advertised elective late-term abortions.
They're taking care to state Kansas law and then go on to explain the many loopholes for terminating viable pregnancies electively.Originally Posted by website
It was a disgusting practice. Trying to put a better face on it by saying that some of the abortions were non-viable doesn't change the fact that many were.
Bookmarks