When is a fascist not a fascist?

**Fragony** · 06-10-2009, 11:11

Originally Posted by HoreTore

So.... They're "ultra-violent", that's why "they" have killed a total of just one guy....?

I'd say Griffin can sleep well at night.

The RAF not ultra violent? Old RAF-members are now in the antifa. They recruit for the FARC, FARC not violent? There was also an attempted murder on Janmaat (not that he wasn't a creep), and why do you think Wilders needs protection. Why do you think bankiers need protection. Because of ultra-violent extreme leftist scum, that's why.

why not google leftist terrorism.

**HoreTore** · 06-10-2009, 11:15

Originally Posted by Fragony

The RAF not ultra violent? Old RAF-members are now in the antifa. They recruit for the FARC, FARC not violent? There was also an attempted murder on Janmaat (not that he wasn't a creep), and why do you think Wilders needs protection. Why do you think bankiers need protection. Because of ultra-violent extreme leftist scum, that's why.

why not google leftist terrorism.

So... That's why their total death count is a grand total of....1?

Yeah, sounds like a real threat.

**Fragony** · 06-10-2009, 11:21

Originally Posted by HoreTore

So... That's why their total death count is a grand total of....1?

Yeah, sounds like a real threat.

quite http://www.cepsr.com/clanek.php?ID=319

**CountArach** · 06-10-2009, 11:40

Originally Posted by Fragony

quite http://www.cepsr.com/clanek.php?ID=319

"The European extreme left in its original strength and influence is now history. The activities of its successors are less violent overall. Unlike the brutal operations of Islamist terrorism which targets masses of civilians, the main tactic of extreme left terrorism is that of damaging property, with only isolated selective attacks on individuals. Weapons with greater damaging effects are very rarely used (as in Greece by the Revolutionary Struggle group)."
- Your article

**Fragony** · 06-10-2009, 11:46

Originally Posted by CountArach

"The European extreme left in its original strength and influence is now history. The activities of its successors are less violent overall. Unlike the brutal operations of Islamist terrorism which targets masses of civilians, the main tactic of extreme left terrorism is that of damaging property, with only isolated selective attacks on individuals. Weapons with greater damaging effects are very rarely used (as in Greece by the Revolutionary Struggle group)."
- Your article

Less violent doesn't mean not violent. And let's not even start about mental terror, it must be quite harrowing to have pictures of your children mailed at you with a little note that they know which school they are going. Very harrowing if your car explodes, very harrowing if your house is set on fire in the middle of the night.

**CountArach** · 06-10-2009, 12:47

Originally Posted by Fragony

Less violent doesn't mean not violent. And let's not even start about mental terror, it must be quite harrowing to have pictures of your children mailed at you with a little note that they know which school they are going. Very harrowing if your car explodes, very harrowing if your house is set on fire in the middle of the night.

Yes, because I'm sure social conservatives have never blown things up.

**Fragony** · 06-10-2009, 12:59

Originally Posted by CountArach

Yes, because I'm sure social conservatives have never blown things up.

Why do you find it so hard to come to terms with something such as leftist terrorism and ultra-violent leftist scum. It exists, I didn't invent it to annoy you. I would have picked the Oklahoma-bombing by the way.

**Rhyfelwyr** · 06-10-2009, 12:39

Originally Posted by HoreTore

So... That's why their total death count is a grand total of....1?

Yeah, sounds like a real threat.

There's no point arguing whether fascits or anti-fascists kill more... at the end of the day, we all agree that fascists are nasty people, but it's kind of ironic when 'anti-fascists' start acting like fascists.