When is a fascist not a fascist?

**HoreTore** · 06-10-2009, 10:52

Originally Posted by Fragony

kidding me? And it very much means just that.

Again, nonsense. Nobody will kill him, and certainly not some youths throwing eggs.

Again I ask; When was the last time someone like these killed someone like Griffin?

EDIT: here's a fun exercise for you frags(and IA too); try searching for "anti fascist murder" on google. Compare how many are committed by fascists, and how many by anti-fascists....

**Fragony** · 06-10-2009, 10:59

Originally Posted by HoreTore

Again, nonsense. Nobody will kill him, and certainly not some youths throwing eggs.

Again I ask; When was the last time someone like these killed someone like Griffin?

Fortuyn for example a few years back. Squating/antifa movement aren't a bunch of hippies, they are ultra-violent scum, first an egg, if you still don't get it a burning cloth in your mail in the middle of the night, half the RAF is in it today, close ties to the FARC and the bio-jugend, dangerous folks who will kill you if they have the chance.

**HoreTore** · 06-10-2009, 11:03

Originally Posted by Fragony

Fortuyn for example a few years back. Squating/antifa movement aren't a bunch of hippies, they are ultra-violent scum, first an egg, if you still don't get it a burning cloth in your mail in the middle of the night, half the RAF is in it today, close ties to the FARC and the bio-jugend, dangerous folks who will kill you if they have the chance.

So.... They're "ultra-violent", that's why "they" have killed a total of just one guy....?

I'd say Griffin can sleep well at night.

**Fragony** · 06-10-2009, 11:11

Originally Posted by HoreTore

So.... They're "ultra-violent", that's why "they" have killed a total of just one guy....?

I'd say Griffin can sleep well at night.

The RAF not ultra violent? Old RAF-members are now in the antifa. They recruit for the FARC, FARC not violent? There was also an attempted murder on Janmaat (not that he wasn't a creep), and why do you think Wilders needs protection. Why do you think bankiers need protection. Because of ultra-violent extreme leftist scum, that's why.

why not google leftist terrorism.

**HoreTore** · 06-10-2009, 11:15

Originally Posted by Fragony

The RAF not ultra violent? Old RAF-members are now in the antifa. They recruit for the FARC, FARC not violent? There was also an attempted murder on Janmaat (not that he wasn't a creep), and why do you think Wilders needs protection. Why do you think bankiers need protection. Because of ultra-violent extreme leftist scum, that's why.

why not google leftist terrorism.

So... That's why their total death count is a grand total of....1?

Yeah, sounds like a real threat.

**Fragony** · 06-10-2009, 11:21

Originally Posted by HoreTore

So... That's why their total death count is a grand total of....1?

Yeah, sounds like a real threat.

quite http://www.cepsr.com/clanek.php?ID=319

**CountArach** · 06-10-2009, 11:40

Originally Posted by Fragony

quite http://www.cepsr.com/clanek.php?ID=319

"The European extreme left in its original strength and influence is now history. The activities of its successors are less violent overall. Unlike the brutal operations of Islamist terrorism which targets masses of civilians, the main tactic of extreme left terrorism is that of damaging property, with only isolated selective attacks on individuals. Weapons with greater damaging effects are very rarely used (as in Greece by the Revolutionary Struggle group)."
- Your article

**Rhyfelwyr** · 06-10-2009, 12:39

Originally Posted by HoreTore

So... That's why their total death count is a grand total of....1?

Yeah, sounds like a real threat.

There's no point arguing whether fascits or anti-fascists kill more... at the end of the day, we all agree that fascists are nasty people, but it's kind of ironic when 'anti-fascists' start acting like fascists.