Results 1 to 30 of 42

Thread: AP vs lethality

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #14
    Xsaçapāvan é Skudra Member Atraphoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    İstanbul, Turkey
    Posts
    1,402

    Default Re: AP vs lethality

    barbaroi has no chance in steppes while nomads have no chance in the middle European forests.
    phalanx in the middle both no chance to expand there.
    (I do not mean player, AI)
    Maybe because of that reason Roman AI is so passive in my campaigns.

    P.S. AP is only for heavily armored troops. Lethality is good in general... In fact I do not see much difference. maybe %10 -20 on casualty. So I can advice the size, choose the unit which has more man if AP unit has more man use it if lethality unit has more man use it. Cavalry is mastered by player, AI is not capable of using cavalry wisely. (Phalanx lovers' frontal charge) so I was about to give up fighting with cavalry dominated factions. I got tired battling 1-2 hours of micromanaging.....
    Last edited by Atraphoenix; 06-15-2009 at 12:13.



    My Submods for EB
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    My AAR/Guides How to assault cities with Horse Archers? RISE OF ARSACIDS! (A Pahlava AAR) - finished
    History is written by the victor." Winston Churchill

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO