Results 1 to 30 of 42

Thread: AP vs lethality

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member mountaingoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Atlantis
    Posts
    461

    Default Re: AP vs lethality

    Quote Originally Posted by Atraphoenix View Post
    though I have not test them hillmen/most axemen have numerical advantage (240) on falxmen (160)
    but no idea whether falxmen compensate this with their AP points (axemen around 1.3 falx around 1.6)
    but hillmen are wiped out by high lethality units.
    1v1 hillmen vs bastarne ( whom are usually cheaper compared to most hillmen ) , the hillmen will be cut down even after throwing a few spears.

    though those axemen are not too bad on the flanks if that is all you can field .

  2. #2

    Default Re: AP vs lethality

    often I make first line with sword infantry (letality 0.13 or 0.22, but good armour) and axe or falxs infantry back(ap+ good letality, but poor armour).
    I leave spearmen in the side to protect the middle from cavalry (0.17 of letal., good armour, but few effective against sword infantry).

    look at Lusitani, they have many units with ap (falcata: letality 0.11), but carry the solifera, a weapon that have ap like pilum.... plus combat bonus in woods..... => Lusitani are the best

    try to thrown pilum (or solifera) in back of enemy unit: this is very deadly way for gain victory.

    some unit that seems poor for they att/def points, are very interested for their special ability and become the key for victory.
    Last edited by Aulus Caecina Severus; 06-15-2009 at 15:36.
    Proud Roman General




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO