Results 1 to 30 of 42

Thread: AP vs lethality

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: AP vs lethality

    Bewarez of Cretans.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  2. #2
    Guest Aemilius Paulus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Russia/Europe in the summer, Florida rest of the time
    Posts
    3,473

    Exclamation Re: AP vs lethality

    Indeed, the force of me is strong in those units. Anyone who possesses AP is powerful.

  3. #3
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: AP vs lethality

    BTW- Numidians, they have AP clubs, bewarez of theys too.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  4. #4

    Default Re: AP vs lethality

    I usually determine two groups for AP Infantry: Light and Heavy

    I prefer using light AP equipped troops for flanking forces since the more amoured guys hold the line while the less armoured AP units (like Eastern Axemen, Drapanai, Agrianikoi Pelekephoroi and other "Light armour breakers") race behind the enemy infantry, throw there Javelins and charge from behind - There ideal for this task because there weapon gives them a chance against better defended soldiers (most of the armoured enemy won't even notice what cut them apart from behind), but there lack of own armour means they would have trouble fighting head on.

    "Heavy armour breakers" (I think Komatai Epilektoi, Thraikioi Rhomphaiaphoroi, Loricati Scutari fall under this category) are able to fight head on against armoured troops, although they themselfs are also somewhat vurneable to AP weapons. The ideal case would be to use them to ambush elite forces instead of wasting them to attack large numbered and unarmoured units.

    I also think the ideal tactic against "light armour breakers" would be to rain arrows on them or attack them with large unarmoured units (the enemy will cause large casualities unless weakend by skirmishers, still it is more worth it then to send vauleable amoured soldiers against them).

    Against "Heavy armour breakers": rain them with missile weapons (prefereably AP) and try to surround them (attack with light mass units first, later with heavier ones).

    Cavalry charges are a good way to decrease the number of AP units: "light" ones may be more numerous, but the lack amour to defend them against repeated charges - they get cut down to size step by step. "heavy" ones are better defended, but there low numbers means that charges can take down a larger prozent of them. (in both cases it is advised to pull back the cavalry after every charge - in melee AP troopers can cause unnecessary loses to the horsemen, always try to mass charge them (3-5 cavalry units at once) so the enemy infantry might even rout after impact.)
    Last edited by HunGeneral; 06-16-2009 at 17:00.
    “Save us, o Lord, from the arrows of the Magyars.” - A prayer from the 10th century.




  5. #5
    Guest Aemilius Paulus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Russia/Europe in the summer, Florida rest of the time
    Posts
    3,473

    Exclamation Re: AP vs lethality

    Quote Originally Posted by HunGeneral View Post
    (I think Komatai Epilektoi, Thraikioi Rhomphaiaphoroi, Loricati Scutari fall under this category)
    The Komatai Epilektoi have a Celtic Longsword, with .225 lethality, but not AP.

  6. #6
    Member Member Cyclops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    968

    Default Re: AP vs lethality

    Its rare to get a line-worthy unit thats cheap enough to be mass produced and has AP. Is the pantopadoi phalanx such a unit? I have a vague memory the secondary is AP, and its poor lethality is offset by the pike.

    Of course in the old builds you could hold a line with Irish or Vasci super heavies, and damn the expense. Didn't much matter what the odds were either. I once swept the Carthies out of Africa in a Lussotannan endgame with 4 of those bad boys backed up by what amounted to an army-sized cheersquad that just looked on and suppressed their nausea.

    It is one of the nice "rock-paper-scissors" elements that you can swamp an expensive elite with 2 cheap units (one line holder and one AP or javelin flanker)...if you have the time and space to effect the manouever.
    From Hax, Nachtmeister & Subotan

    Jatte lambasts Calico Rat

  7. #7
    Slixpoitation Member A Very Super Market's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada, North America, Terra, Sol, Milky Way, Local Cluster, Universe
    Posts
    3,700

    Default Re: AP vs lethality

    All, pantopadoi..... truly the kings of my battlefield. Machimoi have less armour, and Deuteroi lack AP axes. I wouldn't call them particularily cheap though. Still, they are very effective.
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    WELCOME TO AVSM
    Cool store, bro! I want some ham.
    No ham, pepsi.
    They make deli slices of frozen pepsi now? Awesome!
    You also need to purchase a small freezer for storage of your pepsi.
    It runs on batteries. You'll need a few.
    Uhh, I guess I won't have pepsi then. Do you have change for a twenty?
    You can sift through the penny jar
    ALL WILL BE CONTINUED

    - Proud Horseman of the Presence

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO