Quote Originally Posted by Furunculus View Post
do you mean that america agreed to do things for us if we did things for them, wow, revolutionary!
What on earth are you on about? That has absolutely no relation to my comment.

i don't know how to put this any other way, what you utter is base drivel, unreconstructed nonsense.

the use of our strategic deterrent is operationally independant, thus is serves its purpose.
You have no clue what I am on about? Re-read what you said.

"America to refuse to service our missiles"
"Switch off GPS"
"Stop UK's nuclear derrent from fulfilling its purpose"

This means we do not have a independent strategic deterrent but one dependent on the USA! You have America who services our missiles, we are using their GPS, they have our launch codes. How stupid can you get? What is the point in having nuclear weapons when we can't even use them, how much of a threat are they if America has our codes in their briefcase. What about if America is the threat? Afterall, they control all out "strategic deterrent" so it is not going on work against them, is it?

I wish people actually saw things for what they were, instead of this wrapped reality where Britannia rules the waves when we are basically America's satellite state.