what history was wrong?
what numbers were wrong? (are we still pushing the defence figures Tribesman?)
No not still on about the 2nd means 4th figures , this is about the history of the votes and the invented figures and trends you used.
what is wrong with my posited explanation with voting trends?
It starts to fall apart with even the briefest examination , then when you really look it becomes obvious that the explanation is nothing but bollox.

This ....
What you do is, you take a history that is completely off to begin with, drastically simplify it, and then from this simplification deduce an entire world system. It has no bearing on reality.
...really sums it up as an overall explanation of your approach to a wide range of issues.