Quote Originally Posted by Tribesman View Post
No not still on about the 2nd means 4th figures ,

this is about the history of the votes and the invented figures and trends you used.

It starts to fall apart with even the briefest examination , then when you really look it becomes obvious that the explanation is nothing but bollox.

This (louis quote i believe) really sums it up as an overall explanation of your approach to a wide range of issues.
good, because you were wrong.

have voting figures not declined from sixties to forties in the past 20 years, and is that not a decline of a third?

why does it fall apart? frankly no one can say categorically why voting in UK national elections has declined so dramatically, that which i positied has been mentioned as a possible reason that is no more or less credible than any other. why is it incredible that voters lose interest in their politicians as a direct relationship to the trend of politicians goving away the powers that let them affect the lives of their electorate?

that is what you believe, and i don't hold many flattering opinions about you opinions either................ so what?