Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 66

Thread: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

  1. #1
    Wandering Metsuke Senior Member Zim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,190

    Default To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    I was just wondering what most players do with the unique buildings in settlements they conquer. Do you ever destroy them? I just had a very difficult war with Carthage (still going on, actually), losing one of my best settlements and many soldiers, and just finally managed to take Carthage itself. Now I'm trying to convince myself to sack their unique building for the money (and revenge) but I'm having trouble bringing myself to actually do it...
    V&V RIP Helmut Becker, Duke of Bavaria.



    Come to the Throne Room for hotseats and TW rpgs!

    Kermit's made a TWS2 guide? Oh, the other frog....

  2. #2
    Member Megas Methuselah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Prairie Grasslands
    Posts
    5,040

    Exclamation Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Destroy. And don't forget to dump all the salt on the ruins.

  3. #3

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    I ususally act like my faction would. ÍFor example as Makedon I destroy the Colossos of Rhodus because it is a memory for a makedonian defeat - something no true makedonian would allow to stand.

    As with Carthage: if you are palying as Romani then don't hesitate to ruin there unique buildings: they give no bonus to you, you can get lots of money this way and you cause harm to your enemy which he can't repair.

    As some factions you can leavy many unique buildings standing, if your wish or if it provides you any bonuses. As barbarians or nomads I destroy wonders not connected to my own culture.
    “Save us, o Lord, from the arrows of the Magyars.” - A prayer from the 10th century.




  4. #4
    Wandering Metsuke Senior Member Zim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,190

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    I am playing as the Roman (played EB for several years, since .8 came out and never played as them for more than a dozen turns or so before...). It does seem to be the rp thing to do, and all I get from the temple of Baal is a slight increase in tradeable goods and +1 morale or something, nothing like the big bonus Carthage gets.

    It's just so hard for me to destroy anything historical...

    I'll probably go ahead and do it. It does help knowing other people destroy unique buildings. Feel less sacriligeous.
    V&V RIP Helmut Becker, Duke of Bavaria.



    Come to the Throne Room for hotseats and TW rpgs!

    Kermit's made a TWS2 guide? Oh, the other frog....

  5. #5

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Sacriligeus?

    Youre "playing" the future lord of the world in this game - in 90% of all cases your dinasty or empire will be the one who writes history so they will say what is "sacriligeus" (anything your enemies have done to you and your people) and what is "not sacriligeus" (anything you have/are/will be doing)

    Now seriously most of the time some empires or kingdoms would have destroyed these "buildings" - the Romani Barbaroi destroyed most of Karthadast and any culture that got into there path. The epirotes plundered the royal makedonian tombs, and there are many such cases in history...

    And like it is said "History is written by the victor." (does anyone know the latin or greek term for it?) So don't hesitate to do what you must do for your empire and your people.
    “Save us, o Lord, from the arrows of the Magyars.” - A prayer from the 10th century.




  6. #6
    Member Member Chris1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Posts
    338

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    I tend to leave well alone, doesn't do to offend local Gods! Of course playing as Romanii you can afford such generosity as money is not a problem.
    Also in reality most would be plundered not destroyed, and remember we don't get the negative hit from touching such sites, destroying the Temple in Jerusalem should, say, come with a 50 year -90% unrest!
    "Tell them I said something......"
    Pancho Villa
    Completed; Rome AD14!

  7. #7

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Playing as Pahlava, I mostly leave buildings alone, since the Pahlavans were pretty tolerant of most local customs, except when the building in question has anything to do with Alexander. If so, it gets immediately torn down. No Parthian king would leave such a monument to one who conquered his lands standing.

  8. #8

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    I usuallly destroy all that doesn't give me bonuses.

  9. #9

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Long time ago when playing with Pontos i was in HUUGE debt so i've destroyed mausoleum at Halicarnass. After that i was ashamed and from that time i don't destroy any unique buildings.


  10. #10
    Symbasileus ton Rhomaioktonon Member Maion Maroneios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Heraklion, Crete, Greece
    Posts
    2,610

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    If you want to be like the rest who do, then go on and destroy them.

    Maion
    ~Maion

  11. #11
    Member Member mountaingoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Atlantis
    Posts
    461

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    i usually leave them , even if they are damaged ... in my current getai campaign , the parthenon is half destroyed (due to my raid on atheni) ... just a bit over 1000 years early.
    Last edited by mountaingoat; 06-23-2009 at 12:36.

  12. #12
    πολέμαρχος Member Apázlinemjó's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Sopianae
    Posts
    683

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    For faction-rp purpose I destroy some of them if needed.
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



    Finished essays: The Italian Wars (1494-1559), The siege of Buda (1686), The history of Boius tribe in the Carpathian Basin, Hungarian regiments' participation in the Austro-Prussian-Italian War in 1866, The Mithridatic Wars, Xenophon's Anabasis, The Carthagian colonization
    Skipped essays: Serbian migration into the Kingdom of Hungary in the 18th century, The Order of Saint John in the Kingdom of Hungary

  13. #13
    Member Member mountaingoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Atlantis
    Posts
    461

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    apparently you can demolish the mountain in sarmiszegethusa

  14. #14
    Senior Member Senior Member Ibn-Khaldun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    5,489
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    IIRC, then you can "destroy" those unique lakes in Tolosa as well.

  15. #15
    Guest Aemilius Paulus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Russia/Europe in the summer, Florida rest of the time
    Posts
    3,473

    Arrow Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Quote Originally Posted by mountaingoat View Post
    apparently you can demolish the mountain in sarmiszegethusa
    That is messed up. I agree.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ibn-Khaldun View Post
    IIRC, then you can "destroy" those unique lakes in Tolosa as well.
    But this is not. For one, draining lakes is usually quite simple in comparison. Unless they are mountain lakes, as those can be formed in natural pits in the solid rock. But anyway, the reason why that lake can be drained is because tonnes of valuables were sacrifice there. In the building description it says that you can either destroy (drain) it for money or leave it for happiness (Which it does give you regardless of your faction.

    As for myself, I used to destroy useless unique buildings (including the ones with morale and/or trade bonuses, as both did not work), but now I do not destroy anything. I like the uniqueness.

  16. #16
    Member Member Satyros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    158

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    I have only destroyed one building .

    As Epeiros , when captured Roma after a bitter early game struggle against Romaioi ( nope , never got their hands on precious Taras , just tried once and I cut them from the shoulder down ) I happily destroyed the Temple of Jupiter Maximus ( or something like that ) .

    You see I needed the 20k , and wanted the Romaioi to cry a river .

    Both objectives accomplished , I was a richer and happier man .
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    So a tip from me about any Epeiros players out there : DO NOT DISBAND YOUR ELEPHANTES INDIKOI or any units for that matter ! If anything train some more Phalangites Deuteroi with your starting money and move them all across after you capture a couple of Mak cities . You should leave the northernerns and the southerners to their own struggle , strike a peace deal with the Makedonians ( which should be easy after you capture Demetrias ), then focus on the Romaioi , don't even go near Rhegion . To the north . To the downfall of the Romaioi . It took me 5 years of bitter struggle and many battles against all odds but I wiped the Romans , making the Megale Hellas a reality . Yep , the elephants did the trick . Had only one elephant remaining ( = 3 unit str ) , by the time that campaign was over , with 2 golden chevrons .

    Then turn to your Greek cousins , Sicily and empire building .

    You owe it to Pyrros , you know you do .

    Oh , as soon as finances permit DON'T FORGET TO STRENGTHEN YOUR GARISSON IN DEMETRIAS , to discourage any offensive from the Maks and the KH against you in an attempt for any of them to gain the upper hand in what seems to be an even battle . In my game I resolved this simply by picking who to destroy first , it was the KH . Soon after that I attacked and made the Maks my protectorate , so now I am looking towards the east .


    Ride the breeze of better times
    where there are enemies to die
    High fame and honour
    won on the fields of battle .



    Satyros
    Smell the battle in the wind, before you see us.Winterhorde of furyride, the wind will lead us.

  17. #17

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    I just leave them alone, if I am in debt I usually demolish the useless ones.

    'Let no man be called happy before his death. Till then, he is not happy, only lucky." -Solon


  18. #18

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Quote Originally Posted by Aemilius Paulus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mountaingoat
    apparently you can demolish the mountain in sarmiszegethusa
    That is messed up. I agree.
    I believe it's not so much you 'demolishing' the site as it is you plundering it, much one can plunder Delphi. Any holy place tends to be rich in booty.

    It's good to know other people feel dirty about demolishing these buildings too. I can never bring myself to do it.
    Last edited by Saldunz; 06-23-2009 at 17:32.

  19. #19
    Member Member Chris1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Posts
    338

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    I actually "repaired" the cedars of lebanon and next turn got a nice little message aknowledging my plans to stop the damage to the forests!
    "Tell them I said something......"
    Pancho Villa
    Completed; Rome AD14!

  20. #20
    πολέμαρχος Member Apázlinemjó's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Sopianae
    Posts
    683

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris1959 View Post
    I actually "repaired" the cedars of lebanon and next turn got a nice little message aknowledging my plans to stop the damage to the forests!
    Ancient Greenpeace, lawl.
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



    Finished essays: The Italian Wars (1494-1559), The siege of Buda (1686), The history of Boius tribe in the Carpathian Basin, Hungarian regiments' participation in the Austro-Prussian-Italian War in 1866, The Mithridatic Wars, Xenophon's Anabasis, The Carthagian colonization
    Skipped essays: Serbian migration into the Kingdom of Hungary in the 18th century, The Order of Saint John in the Kingdom of Hungary

  21. #21
    Symbasileus ton Rhomaioktonon Member Maion Maroneios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Heraklion, Crete, Greece
    Posts
    2,610

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    LOL at the Greenpeace comment

    I remember repairing the Temple of Artemis once for a whooping 20,000+ or something like that. I thought I saw around 2,000, so you bet I was surprised to see my incomes high in the red the next turn.

    Maion
    ~Maion

  22. #22

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Oh, THAT unique buildings! I thought we were talking about foreign governments/barracks!

    i never destroy unique buildings, i like to read their description.

  23. #23
    Symbasileus ton Rhomaioktonon Member Maion Maroneios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Heraklion, Crete, Greece
    Posts
    2,610

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikhail Mengsk View Post
    Oh, THAT unique buildings!
    Well, isn't it obvious?

    Maion
    ~Maion

  24. #24
    lictor Member Urg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    138

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikhail Mengsk View Post
    I usuallly destroy all that doesn't give me bonuses.
    Me too.

  25. #25
    Strategos Autokrator Member Vasiliyi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    839

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Ive never destroyed those unique buildings. I think that later in the game after Ive conquered the world Ill look back and think of what a benevolent ruler Ive been.

    4x
    1x

  26. #26
    Member Member Knight of Heaven's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Portugal , Olisipo
    Posts
    139

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Yes i never destroy any of those unic buildings, in some cases i even reapair then if need be. I never feel the need to fill my coffers i have always alot of monney,main expection is in the start turns.
    im doing a makedonian campaing and a romani one. i thought to destroy those temples in Cartage but i didnt do it...yet i belive ill do not for the need but for role play. ill also destroy the temple in jerusalem, when ill conquer it as romani. Alltough ill not destroy any other wonder.
    "History is written by the victor."
    This was said by Wiston Churchill
    Last edited by Knight of Heaven; 06-23-2009 at 23:51.

  27. #27

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Ok maybe I am not understanding but are you saying that unique buildings only help the faction that built them? I am playing a Roman campaign right now, conquered about 40 cities around 230BC, and have not destroyed any unique buildings just baracks, local militia and the foreign governments. If they offer no benefit then I might as well destroy them.

  28. #28
    Member Member Macilrille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts
    1,592

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunzak View Post
    Ok maybe I am not understanding but are you saying that unique buildings only help the faction that built them? I am playing a Roman campaign right now, conquered about 40 cities around 230BC, and have not destroyed any unique buildings just baracks, local militia and the foreign governments. If they offer no benefit then I might as well destroy them.
    Some do, some do not is the short answer. The long one is that to the original owner or anyone of same culture, there is a large bonus, for others there is a smaller one, sometimes none. In my current Sweboz campaign I destroy some, but leave some, Stonehenge still stands for example, while the lakes at Tolosa is drained for all the gold. Rome was dead anyway, so Caepio could not do it ;-)
    'For months Augustus let hair and beard grow and occasionally banged his head against the walls whilst shouting; "Quinctillius Varus, give me my legions back"' -Sueton, Augustus.

    "Deliver us oh God, from the fury of the Norsemen", French prayer, 9th century.
    Ask gi'r klask! ask-vikingekampgruppe.dk

    Balloon count: 13

  29. #29
    Near East TW Mod Leader Member Cute Wolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    In ancient Middle East, driving Assyrian war machines...
    Posts
    3,991
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    2 Options:

    1 - As The Nomad / Barbaric King (Alter ego 1)
    Naah, I'm actually not so benovalent nor humane... especially when playing with those nomads... I DESTROY EVERYTHING THAT MADE ME MORE MONEY... Mwahahahaha..... (with exception trade bonuses)

    2 - As A good, Philosophical Hellene Strategos(Alter ego 2)
    Oh... only if I have a really sore need of money, but then, in my non money-cheating KH campaign, usually The Colossus on Rhodos, and Makedonian tomb got destroyed... As Makedon, I usually get Epirote temple and Oracle of Zeus Destroyed, and in all campaign, Temple of Jupiter Maximus and the Getic Mounntain will be destroyed (Hate both Romani and Getai) I need the money...

    My Projects : * Near East Total War * Nusantara Total War * Assyria Total War *
    * Watch the mind-blowing game : My Little Ponies : The Mafia Game!!! *

    Also known as SPIKE in TWC

  30. #30
    Xsaçapāvan é Skudra Member Atraphoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    İstanbul, Turkey
    Posts
    1,402

    Default Re: To destroy or not to destroy (unique buildings)

    I never destroy uniques, even repair them I wish there would be such charismatic trait when you do repair them.
    I only destroy gov buildings and barracks. But in sacking campaigns I raze the the cities to the ground again except uniques.



    My Submods for EB
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    My AAR/Guides How to assault cities with Horse Archers? RISE OF ARSACIDS! (A Pahlava AAR) - finished
    History is written by the victor." Winston Churchill

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO