thanks bobin some usefull information indeed

maybe a crimean kingdom with alot of schytian influence could work better idd (as i said my bad then )

super there´s a reason why hellas and aristoteles considered it the center of the world. it´s where the best information is about the people culture and political-economical-military of this time frame

with more slot some parts will be overcrowded. there´s an high probability of 3 factions starting in iberia (maybe 4 with that illergete plea) + 2 more can eventually enter the peninsula and make it a hot spot of the game (arverni and romani) so iberia an area with 10 regions being fought over by 4 factions (maybe more) seems a bit crowded 2

besides thats list is what i would like to see/believe will show up
since a nurghian (sardinian) faction doesn´t make much sence as it can be better represented by strong eleutheroi stacks with stone forts.
i don´t believe a scandinavian faction would fair well without having to destroy the sweaboz.
a maurs kingdom would put in jeopardy the hability for numidia to press on the carthaginians

there´s that shitload of possible factions in the balkans of thracian-galo influence (a celtic/thracian kingdom could be nice to watch and play) (an illyrian faction i stll hope there will be one stoping the romans from entereing the balkans 2 soon)

anyway enough rant from me i trully believe a new horse archer faction with some proper greek teachings (economical and architectural) could make for the best underdog ever as a steppe faction with a strong economy and the hability to build stone walls could be deadly for the rest if they happened to survive the 1st turns without sucumbing to the sauro´s or the getai