Occultus and the hidden Factions (Discussion)

[Apraxiteles]

Because having more exclamation points make your argument so much more compelling. I realize that spreading misinformation is part of the fun of all this, but can't you try a little harder?

[a completely inoffensive name]

Almost every single occultus sig has been shown to be recycled, why would this one be any different. None of the occultus sigs even remotely looked like the current Pergamon one before it was revealed.

[bobbin]

What are you talking about?

The first occultus sigs were for the Arverni, Saba and Saka IIRC
Apart from the Arverni one being recycled as a joke none of the others have.

Some very poor attempt at misinformation on your part I must say.

[a completely inoffensive name]

What are you talking about?

The first occultus sigs were for the Arverni, Saba and Saka IIRC
Apart from the Arverni one being recycled as a joke none of the others have.

Some very poor attempt at misinformation on your part I must say.

I could have sworn all of the redish ones (including the one shown at the top post of the page) were Saka and the other one was outright confirmed as recycled Arverni.

[bobbin]

They're the same colour scheme, but i'm pretty certain they're not the Saka as I can't see any way the gold patterns would match up. Plus the Occultus sig is decidedly scaley, something the Saka symbol is not.

[Skullheadhq]

Saka is pure gold, and I think i see some ivory there.

-Skullheadhq

[Andronikos]

Even if it is Saka sig, it is a NEW Saka sig. It looks much different than the old one.

[Ludens]

Back to topic, please.

[paullus]

i'm so excited!

[Kikaz]

to put in my two cents... the first and fourth are definitely the same, possibly a steppe faction. The second is an unknown, I'll guess that it's the Noricans

[Tellos Athenaios]

i'm so excited!

So am I. I lost track of the EB 2 factions; it should be great to get it back.