Poll: Do you want the 3 starter generals to be permanent Dukes or Steward Dukes?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 30 of 44

Thread: Stewards or Dukes?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    ETW Steam: Little Fox Member mini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    899

    Default Re: Stewards or Dukes?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheFlax View Post
    (What sort of name is Michiel anyways. Seems like Michel with a typo. )

    actually, Michiel is a flemish/dutch male firts name.

    it's supposed to be the flemish/dutch version of Michael (eng) / Michel (fr)

  2. #2
    The Search for Beefy Member TheFlax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    2,012

    Default Re: Stewards or Dukes?

    Quote Originally Posted by mini View Post
    actually, Michiel is a flemish/dutch male firts name.

    it's supposed to be the flemish/dutch version of Michael (eng) / Michel (fr)
    Ooops.... It just seemed an unlikely name from my point of view. (Which has no knowledge of flemish/dutch names.)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro View Post
    TheFlax needs to die on principle. No townie should even be that scummy.

  3. #3
    Loitering Senior Member AussieGiant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Zurich
    Posts
    4,162

    Default Re: Stewards or Dukes?

    Ah crap...we're out voted.

    This should be interesting.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Stewards or Dukes?

    Quote Originally Posted by AussieGiant View Post
    Ah crap...we're out voted.
    My fault, sorry - for a minute, I had what we wanted but then I blew it by putting it to vote:

    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...&postcount=177

    I forgot a basic lesson from student and office politics - if you are pushing for something, do it informally and don't put it to a vote unless you know you are going to win. Or, as TinCow might say, don't start a war unless you know you'll win it; don't ask a question in court you don't know the answer to.

    To be honest, there have been some good arguments for permanent Dukes. I just hope we get Houses with some stability rather than shoals of piranhas coalescing just for the latest meal.

  5. #5
    Bureaucratically Efficient Senior Member TinCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    13,729

    Default Re: Stewards or Dukes?

    Meh, I'm not too worried one way or another. One of the things that frustrated me most about LotR was that I had tons of ideas about how to make it fun and interesting, but I couldn't implement them without being a player in the game. I promise, if things get boring it won't be long before everyone in the game wants to lynch me. I wouldn't be surprised if I cycled through more than two avatars this time.


  6. #6
    Prince Louis of France (KotF) Member Ramses II CP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,701

    Default Re: Stewards or Dukes?

    I vow to create a character who can and will act decisively to keep things interesting.


  7. #7
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Stewards or Dukes?

    It's funny how, as we repeat these WotS type PBMs, players may start to acquire certain reputations for how they will role play their characters.

    When this game starts, I half expect old timers who receive their first in character friendly PMs from TinCow or Ramses may react like a Civ player who has just made first contact with Ghengis Khan or Shaka.
    Last edited by econ21; 07-06-2009 at 22:36.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO