Ah, Those Journalists

[Brenus]

No, Sarmatian asked a question about journalists and the fact that during the NATO attack, the leaders of the Alliance did decide that Radio and TV station were fair game as regarded as Propaganda tools so legitimate target, as bridge, railways and others components in a modern war.

“Louis point is, I think, that you fail to recognise the Serbian bias and the narrative of victimisation that bias creates.” That is of subject.
Louis, I think fail to recognise he was brain washed during this period of time. Even if today, Kouchner and Simone Veil recognised in various books and interview that they didn’t tell the truth, even if nowadays nobody dear to speak of the systematic campaign of rapes, the horse shoes tactic, Racak and Merkale as Serbian atrocities, Louis is still under the feeling he had in watching the French news…
In few days it will be the 15 anniversary of Srebrenica: And the number of victims still will be between 7000 and 8000. No change. Even if the number of bodies recovered till today for the entire war is around 3600, this including the Serbian victims (by the way, can somebody tell me where is the native Serbian population of Srebrenica?).
I don’t want to go too much in detail, but the bias in this case in the NATO side.

A part of the Serbian population was indeed nationalist, but less than the Croats. If you go in both countries you won’t notice until somebody tell you (me): In Croatia, flags everywhere… In Serbian only where it has to…
About the aggression, interesting enough, in the main cases, it wasn’t the Serbs who started… Not in Sarajevo, not in Vukovar. Not in Slovenia were a JNA helicoptere was shot down…
It was one of the points in the opening of Milosevic’s trial and to see the face of Carla del Ponte when Milocevic was able to refute this was quite a good moment of TV reality show.
Not I have any sympathy for Milocevic, the man having too much blood on his hand, as much as his accomplices Tudjman and Izetbegovic, for the main…