Campaign difficulty recommendations

[Ravenfeeder]

I prefer H/M myself. On VH the AI tends to spam elite stacks at you and it gets boring. On M the AI never hires mercenaries and the rebels never attack your cities, which also gets boring.

[johnhughthom]

On M the AI never hires mercenaries and the rebels never attack your cities, which also gets boring.

That is the reason I would never try M campaign. I rarely hire mercs so the AI can have them and the game is still relatively easy, I would hate to try a game where it didn't hire them. I play H/M.

[Rilder]

That is the reason I would never try M campaign. I rarely hire mercs so the AI can have them and the game is still relatively easy, I would hate to try a game where it didn't hire them. I play H/M.

Errm are you sure about this? I swear I saw a few mercs in a M campaign.

[Ravenfeeder]

Not completely sure, no. But the couple of times I played M/M I didn't see any and that was fighting AS who normally seem to have loads.

[Atraphoenix]

for peaceful game play : M/M
for reasonable and best for role play : H/M
only choice blitzing and get tired of elites : VH/M
if you like challenge : H/H
if you like suicidal games and have problem on masochism VH/VH