Economy

[Christianus]

Ave!
I remember the overview of the economy-system in EB for RTW was way of with its numbers.
Will it be the same in EBII?

[Mediolanicus]

Explain how the RTW overview was off?

[Alsatia]

In RTW, the numbers taken from the cities shows its total revenue then subtracts debt. In M2TW, it only shows income from the cities, but the nuber does not subtract the defecit. To find the defcit, you have to go to the financial overview.

I thnk that is his difference in numbers.

[/Bean\]

I prefer the RTW system. It's much quicker to see where you're making and losing money. The MedII system makes it look like you're empire is really rich, but you still lose money. Rather misleading.

[Skullheadhq]

Hardcoded
I'm sorry, I know it really sucks. When you think you're getting rich you're actually losing a lot of money, just like the modern day bankers.

[Ludens]

I prefer the RTW system. It's much quicker to see where you're making and losing money. The MedII system makes it look like you're empire is really rich, but you still lose money. Rather misleading.

Although I see the point of the R:TW system, it made it harder to identify your profitable cities. I suspect many new R:TW players never realized this until it was pointed out to them, and therefore upgraded backwaters because it looked like they made more money than big, central cities.

[Megas Methuselah]

I, for one, prefer the M2TW system. As Lemur says, it's easier to identify your bread-winning cities. It's not difficult to open your financial scroll to study your total revenue, total expenses, and net earnings/losses.