we have had this argument many times, and there are 3 types, there are people who say its total war, there are people who say there is too much war, and then there are the people playing empire total war! lol
I look at this as it meant to be being a strategy game, like a four X game, Xpand Xplore Xploit and whatever the fourth one is. There is no reason that I can see that this game cannot have intelligent opponents like games like Civilizations 4 and Galactic Civilizations. If the campaign was all just about the battle maps, why bother with diplomacy and all the little other bits that make the campaign interesting, why bother with all those little tidbits of history? I think however those little tidbits of history could have been events that changed the game and randomly gave one nation an advantage over the others. The closest game that comes to this series of games I would say is Galactic Civilizations 2. The reason for this is that in GC2 they finally decided to depict the battles, unfortunately they are predetermined by the game, but they gave them graphical demonstrations. So GC2 battles = crap ETW AI = crap.
The black knight AI is still very much alive (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhRUe-gz690 watching it always makes me feel better)
I Was 5 turns into my british campaign and i was already at war with spain and france and I think a few others lol, I don't mind being at war with france and spain though, nautral enemies of GB,
Although by 1720, most AI's were at war with the rest of the world, and it now being 1779, NOT A SINGLE ONE. Has made peace with any other AI nation, unless they destroyed that faction. At least I could rely on the Black knight AI to declare war on me, I wiped out the last of the Marathas on the indian continent because I need Hindustan to win the campaign for GB, but Mughal owns it, as soon as I owned maratha's lands, Mughal declared war on me, losing 8k a turn in trade revenue.
It is easier to have friends in the latest version of the game now and having reliable allies, I am an ally with Prussia, I was having trouble in that Sweden would continually cut off our trade revenue, which was worth 6k a turn to me from prussia, so I had to sit a navy near prussia's trade port, unfortunately there was alot of swedish agression and it was impossible to keep repaired ships there as it took 2 turns to get them abck to a british port and repaired and by then the swedes had blocked the trade route again. So I sent an army to attack and take courland, and the region right next door to it across the bridge. Prussia slowly over the next few turns put an army next to courlands capital and I was wondering if they wanted it. Anyway sure enough ending a turn, Prussia Asked me if they could have Courland (Seeing they were an ally and probably needed it for a victory condition and I didn't I gave it to them and they gave me some random territory theyd captured deep in russian territory, so i've been allies with them since the start of the game, strangely enough even though spain lost its main territory to portugal, (Spain wiped out portugal, I took spain and portugal, allowed portugal to rebel and gave them portugal and spain in return for protectorate)
Spain and France have been allies since the game started and now spain only owns flanders.
It looks like naval invasions for france and spain might be broken or at the very least, they find it hard to cross the channel because there are many many french armies sitting along normandy looking like they badly want to attack the british isles.
Anyway for me its a strategy game and if they keep going into the direction of total war all the time every minute, I will go back to civ 4 and other games, and even if they make the battles prettier ( won't help me don't have the computer for it) not everyone can appreciate graphics, but EVERYONE, EVERYONE EVERYONE can appreciate GOOD ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.
Bookmarks