Quote Originally Posted by bobbin View Post
When it comes to those traits i have a general set of priorities, charismatic<sharp<vigorous

ie vigourous is the most important and i will never accept a FM without i'm unless im really stuck, after that obviously sharp and the charisma which is probably the least important in my opinion.

I'd imagine some people would dissagree with me but bear in mind i use my FM's for leading armies mostly so you really need that vigorous trait to prevent them from getting too tierd during campaign.
I still prefer sharp then vigorous, afterall, a general full of stamina, but with low or no command stars is simply not worth it. If he's not vigorous, just let him sit most of his time governing a good province for some extra cash and management bonus.