Quote Originally Posted by Aemilius Paulus View Post
What exactly is "erotic art" mentioned in the story? Is it art with sexual connotations, or is it a mere excuse for pornography? I do not see any advantage of making pornography in a church, so is it really that?

So if it is art, albeit erotic, then what is the problem? Now, the graveyard incident was perhaps of greater practical offense, but still... Or is there a law against making photoshoots without permission? And how exactly does one make a photoshoot in a church without the permission of the priest?
Erotic art is porn with a soft focus lense, it is meant to arouse, note it says "fetishist and erotic art". Essentially, scantily clad women were cavorting around a church and graveyard.

As to why the Church was open; some priests leave their churches open so that they can be used, as churches. To be more explicit, they are left open at risk so that people have somewhere to pray. Sometimes they are dessecrated or vandalised, but not that often. In this case the priest may now start locking his church during daylight hours, depriving people of that facility.

This man abused the trust of the Priest and the Parish and used the Church for something he knew would offend. Churches are not public property, if they are open it is out of generosity.