Thank you very much.
Fair enough, I'll stop asking repetetive questions. Tho, I've never been rude (besides my extremely offensive signaure), and I havent experienced a whole lot of rudeness in the EB forums, just very tort answers to questions that have been asked a billion and one times. I think people are just on edge trying to wait for EB while dealing with the aftermath of ETW, because, honestly if you want bad behavior go there and see wats being said there.
I'll be a good boy.
Thanks and good luck
Thank God. I hope those "roman-haters" finally get the sense to stay on topic.
don't try to play innocent, meth... at least a quarter of your post count is spam. You've got only 4 months longer on the .org than me and almost 3 times as many posts.
Last edited by Celtic_Punk; 08-18-2009 at 12:30.
'Who Dares WINS!' - SAS
"The republic stands for truth and honour. For all that is noblest in our race. By truth and honour, principle and sacrifice alone will Ireland be free."-Liam Mellows
Who knows? If it's a enough day we may all end up Generals!"
I would agree that cutting down on thins like in before the lock posts is good, but don't you think you are taking this too far? What you are saying seems to indicate that a completely innocent comment would get you banned. Say somebody was viewing an aar where the Romans were wiped out and said, "Yay! The Romans are dead!" According to your policy, that could get you in trouble. That kind of overrestrictive moderating seems kind of ridiculous. I know that your overall goal is good, I'm just asking that you don't take this policy to an extreme. Just my two cents.
The ranking of the Nations of the world.
>
>
>All the rest.
"Your turning violet, Violet!"
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
In case it's unclear, we are referring to repeated spamming and/or attacks. Just posting "in before the lock" nonsense once will get you a warning, nothing more.
Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!
Bookmarks