We have had many a discussion (including currently) about the future of Israel and what she needs to consider to secure a peaceful path, but we rarely concentrate on the Arab world - except for rather tiresome stereotypes fitting whichever position we take.
The renowned Arabist and journalist Robert Fisk has written a piercing piece on the mediaevalist swamp in which many Arab countries dwell. Though one might argue that mediaeval Islam was somewhat more advanced than our current experience, the point of backwardness is well made.
Will a solution to the Arab-Israeli war resolve all this? Some of it, perhaps. Without the constant challenge of crisis, it would be much more difficult to constantly renew emergency laws, to avoid constitutionality, to distract populations who might otherwise demand overwhelming political change. Yet I sometimes fear that the problems have sunk too deep, that like a persistently leaking sewer, the ground beneath Arab feet has become too saturated to build on.
I was delighted some months ago, while speaking at Cairo University – yes, the same academy which Barack Obama used to play softball with the Muslim world – to find how bright its students were, how many female students crowded the classes and how, compared to previous visits, well-educated they were. Yet far too many wanted to move to the West. The Koran may be an invaluable document – but so is a Green Card. And who can blame them when Cairo is awash with PhD engineering graduates who have to drive taxis?
The issue is what to do about it. As one who favours a policy of avoiding foreign entanglements, I believe that Fisk's suggestion of disengagement is valid. But then there are many economic interests that drive the West's entanglements - not least the siren call of oil that seduces us to imperialism and partnerships with the Devil.
Thoughts?
Bookmarks