I recently started a Koinon Hellenon campaign myself and also found this a bit odd. Just with how the system of expansion works, it was a bit of a change to steer away from the Roman method where you know Italia is Homeland and the gist of your nearby conquests are Subjugation ready.
Hostorically, Corinth in 272 BC is more "Macedonian" centered than "KH" centered, as well as there was a fact that Macedonian - dominated federation was named "Corinthian Language". So it make sense if Corinth was become not a "homeland" to the greeks that time...
Angkara Murka di Macapada
Correct, although I am pretty sure that type II does not represent a government-style but full inclusion in the KH without institution of the agoge. Type III and IV are partial inclusion in the KH.
No, for the KH "Homeland" represent provinces where the agoge can be instituted, while "expansion" are non-agoge Hellenic provinces.
The Cretans used the same communal messes system that the Spartans used: institution of the Agoge would be possible there. Thessaly and Byzantium were given homeland resources because there were helot-like underclasses present. I am not sure why Taras and Delphi get the homeland resource, though. Maybe they were Spartan colonies?
Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!
AFAIK they only founded Taras as colony. Sparta concentreted only its power on the Peloponnes.
Bookmarks