Mes Seigneurs,
What I hear in this Conseil makes me wonder if the nobility of France didn't have its brain addled by too many battles and suffered too many strokes to the head...
I've already stated my opposition to Edict 3.1 and the grounds on which I base such an opposition. Furthermore said Edict would require me to turn tail most dishonourably, something which I will not do.
On the matter of mercenaries, they are expedient. True they are onerous... But with that cost comes professionalism, something which our own army still lacks. Can we field crossbowmen other than poorly trained militia ?
As to thier loyalty, mercenaries are loyal to coin, so, as long as we cn provide they'll be loyal to us... And frankly, if they were not in our service, they would be in the service of our enemies as has been evidenced in Pamplona : where did you think the defenders got their reinforcements from ? I remember my son Louis wondering about the disappearance of the mercenary companies in Iberia... He ought to have look at our enemies' lines. The almost same thing happened here in England and was partly cause of the death of Robert Bouchart.
And as I said in the beginning, they are expedient. None of the proposed legislation takes into account the needs of our generals in the field. What if one general, at the front, needed some reinforcements with only mercenaries available and Louis' proposal was in effect, and his House had already received its quota ? Then he would be left stranded and certainly defeated and maybe killed ? What if riots threatened in one of our border provinces and the only ting that could restore order would be the recruitment and garrisoning of the city by some mercenay company ? Edict 3.4 would prevent this.
Edict 3.5 doesn't make much sense as it does not state its intent clearly. Why march against Edinburgh when the will of this august body is to abandon the British Isles to their own devices ?
Edict 3.3 is the only edicts which finds grace to my eyes. Though I'm not sure this is the correct course of action, it had least provides a sensible solution to our disentanglement from the Isles.
Thus, when I consider all that I've stated, and with no disrespect intended to my son Louis or Thomas de St-Amand, I will exercise my prerogative and nominate myself to the position of Senechal.
I expect the full cooperation of all Houses in the years to come and await your proposed legislation as to what you feel should be the course we must set in the next term for our Kingdom.
Bookmarks