Results 1 to 30 of 122

Thread: [Multi-AAR] - History of men - EB part

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: [Multi-AAR] - History of men - EB part

    Awesome AAR - How are you going to go all the way up to 1500 AD though?

  2. #2
    The Naked Rambler Member Roka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    296

    Default Re: [Multi-AAR] - History of men - EB part

    Good to see this is still going

  3. #3
    Useless Member Member Fixiwee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    509

    Default Re: [Multi-AAR] - History of men - EB part

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaiscedach View Post
    Awesome AAR - How are you going to go all the way up to 1500 AD though?
    In my first test run I actually played untill 1500 AD, so it's possible. It just takes a lot of time and patience. :)

  4. #4
    Useless Member Member Fixiwee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    509

    Default Re: [Multi-AAR] - History of men - EB part

    Transcript of the college presentation during the lecture „The Roman Republic“ in 2003, University of Minnesota, USA

    [Trevor Adams speaking]:
    Dear colleges, dear professor, my presentation today is about the Roman peacetime period between 246 BC and 220 BC. In this presentation I will tell you about the events during this particular period and what actually lead to the series of devastating wars in 220 BC. First of all, 246 BC marks the beginning of a peacetime era for
    Rome. The first Punic war was over; Rome had endured many decades of war and thus tired of fighting. But the victory over the Carthaginians also brought new land, or provinces, which were governed by senators. That meant new taxes and trading posts for the growing “Roman Empire”. This era was also called the small golden age, since there was little foreign threat and Rome became a rich through trade.


    But the peacetime period was not uneventful, there were even small wars which make the term “peacetime period” sound rather absurd. But nevertheless the conflicts were quite small compared to the first Punic war.

    Well, the Romans made new allies in southern France and Spain. In those areas independent Greek colonies existed that were harassed by Gauls and Celtic tribes. The Romans allied themselves with the two major Greek cities Massalia, modern day Marseille and Empuries or also called Emporion. The deal was that the Romans sent troops for security while the Greek cities had to trade heavily with Rome. De jure those cities remained independent, but in reality the cities slowly became a part of Rome. Oh I forgot to mention, that deal was made around 235 BC. Well anyway…

    Another important event happened in 238 BC, when the Carthaginian mercenary general Hipposander revolted in Sardinia, which was nominally under the rule of Carthage. Some Roman traders were killed in that revolt and Rome was quick to dispatch troops to Sardinia and killing Hipposander. Carthage feared another war with Rome and did not demand the control back over Sardinia. But this lead to much mischief with the Carthaginians and more and more people demanded revenge, which would eventually lead to another war with Rome in 220 BC.

    In 225 BC the Boii Celts, situated in the Po valley in Italy, attacked the kingdom of Illyria and envoys came to Rome begging for help. The Romans had not much love for those Celts and agreed to snet assistance. The disciplined Roman army had no trouble defeating the small Celtic amry in modern day Slovenia and they placed the king Deutemirus back to power. There was no formal treaty, but the Romans were now “friends” – or amici as the Romans would say – with the Kingdom with Illyria. The link was a moral one, which arose from the “beneficium” of their liberation. They had to show Rome practical gratitude, while Rome was morally engaged to maintain their liberty.

    The year 220 BC saw an end to the Roman peacetime period. Reason for this was a treaty made in 222 BC with the kingdom of Macedon. A year later the Epirotes, an old enemy of Rome, started a war with Macedon and the Romans decided to step in and solve the situation. But this, I think, is already the topic of the presentation next week by my college Mary.
    My conclusion of this so called peacetime period is that it was a period of increasing wealth and expansion for the Romans. Rome was now a major player in the Mediterranean Sea and solved a few crises with military might. Thank you.

    [The Professor speaking]:
    Thank you mister Adams. Good presentation with many important details. One major flaw though, you could have used more maps for clarification. I think not everyone in this room knows exactly where the Illyrian kingdom was situated.

  5. #5
    Useless Member Member Fixiwee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    509

    Default Re: [Multi-AAR] - History of men - EB part

    Why is this only a small pictureless update? FRAPS did not take pictures during this period so I lost my data and information. Hence I decided to make a small update, since this period was rather uneventfull anyway. The text was written like someone would actually speak it. I hope it's not a pain to read that way. :)

  6. #6
    Guitar God Member Mediolanicus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    On the banks of the Scaldis.
    Posts
    1,355

    Default Re: [Multi-AAR] - History of men - EB part

    It reads well!

    Actually your AAR formed the inspiration to begin my AAR - although yours has more screens in a normal update....
    __________________

    --> - Never near Argos - <--

  7. #7
    Useless Member Member Fixiwee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    509

    Default Re: [Multi-AAR] - History of men - EB part

    Quote Originally Posted by Mediolanicus View Post
    It reads well!

    Actually your AAR formed the inspiration to begin my AAR - although yours has more screens in a normal update....
    Wow. I am already an insperation to other people. And I am still quite the newbie with AARs.
    But hey cheers for your nice words. :)

  8. #8
    Useless Member Member Fixiwee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    509

    Default Re: [Multi-AAR] - History of men - EB part

    "Zeus most glorious and most great, Thundercloud, throned in the heavens! Let not the sun go down and the darkness come, until I cast down headlong the citadel of Priam in flames, and burn his gates with blazing fire, and tear to rags the shirt upon Hectors breast! May many of his men fall about him prone in the dust and bite the earth! "
    -Homer - The Illiad


    534 Ab Urbe Condita
    Silanos – Historiai
    (written about 130 BC)


    Who is Silanos?
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    Silanos was a greek historian who lived from 200BC to 120 BC. He came to Rome [under reasons that have not happend yet - this will be edited]. His account on the Roman history are of high value since he followed the pragmatic histiography like Demosthnes of Ancyle.


    Book VI
    […] So it came that the year 534 ab urbe Condita [220 BC] saw the start of a series of conflicts. But before the reader is able to understand what lead to the second Epirus war and the second Punic war as well, the reader has to look at the political situation that preceded the war. To the west of Rome Carthage was expanding in Spain to compensate the losses of Sicily, Sardinia and Corsica. Carthage was a trading nation and the coast of Spain offered new possibilities for trade.
    To the east the kingdom of Epirus was waging war against Macedon. In 536 AUC [222 BC] the Romans signed a formal treaty with the Macedon king Antigonus III Amynous to send money and supplies to the Macedon cause. A year later the Macedons lost another battle so that Antigonus III had abandoned most of the Macedon home land.
    The Romans felt a moral obligation to aid their allies against the king of Epirus Polyanthes Aiakides and without much hesitation and trouble they sailed a full legion to the coast of Epirus in the year 534 AUC [220 BC]. At that time the king of Epirus, Polyanthes Aiakides, was residing in the capital Ambrakia with only his royal guard to his protection. His army was campaigning against Macedon out of his reach. When the Romans realized that Polyanthes was in the capital without any troops they quickly started laying siege against the city, closing every road in and out of Ambrakia. It is said that Polyanthes screamed “Bring me the man who taught those primitive Romans how to use a boat!” when he became aware that he was trapped.
    Despite being a proud and brilliant military leader and king Polyanthes agreed, heading his advisors to negotiate with his enemy. The Roman consul Quintus Atilius Scaevola received the proud king in his army tent, greeting him with all military honours. There the consul made clear that the Roman people had no interest in killing Epirotes and plundering Polyanthes lands. What both man talked that day is not written down, so I cannot retell the story about it, but in the end the king of Epirus agreed to stop making war against the Macedons and restore their land to the status quo while the Romans would return to their land and make peace with Polyanthes. So in the autumn 534 AUC [220BC] the conflict seemed to be over already.
    In the winter of the same year a group of Carthaginian ships landed in the port of Emporion, a Greek city-state situated in Spain and allied with Rome. The Carthaginian ships destroyed a few Greek ships and plundered some minor goods. It was by all means clear to the Carthaginians that this action against an ally of Rome was a direct threat to Rome itself. But it has puzzled many historians as well as myself as of why the Carthaginians were eager to battle the Romans again. Yet this small incident was the beginning of a long and bloody conflict in Spain. At the same time Polyanthes was already planning his next step against the Macedons and the Romans.
    In this sense, the year 534 marks a new step in the history of Rome, as it was more and more drawn into the affairs of the Greeks.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO