1.3.1. Ridiculous "gameplay" adjustments by CA

**antisocialmunky** · 08-29-2009, 00:29

Eh... the title of this thread is misleading, I thought you were going to talk about rifled dragoons and such quakery.

I want my money back!

**Slaists** · 08-30-2009, 15:37

Originally Posted by antisocialmunky

Eh... the title of this thread is misleading, I thought you were going to talk about rifled dragoons and such quakery.

I want my money back!

Nobody's stopping you from expanding from the OP here. The title covers it all.

**A1_Unit** · 09-10-2009, 00:24

It's only safe to ally with someone if you don't share a border with them.

**Fisherking** · 09-10-2009, 08:14

Originally Posted by A1_Unit

It's only safe to ally with someone if you don't share a border with them.

No! That is not safe either.

I played a French Campaign. The turn after I got a trade agreement with the Marathas they were blockaded. That lasted until I went to India and cleared the blockade in about 1780 or so.

Usually they clear ports every 20 years or so but not this time. A 75 year blockade is a bit much.

I think that other than the bugs and the over generous economy, this game started well but the AI and Diplomacy changes have mostly been mistakes.

**Durallan** · 09-10-2009, 12:13

you think this is bad? wait till the naval changes in 1.4

**A1_Unit** · 09-10-2009, 17:20

My heroic (and impossible) victories over the superior pirate fleets will come to an end.

**Sheogorath** · 09-15-2009, 10:30

I personally find myself wondering how they messed the AI up so badly...I mean, the released diplomatic AI was almost perfect...maybe a little too easygoing with the peace treaties, but not all that bad...and they somehow managed to turn a mild-mannered and semi-intelligent AI into a rabid beast that consumes and destroys all before it...and it took them two patches after that to get it back to any semblance of sanity, even though it's still crazy.