Into Pantomime season early this year
Oh no it isn'tIt really is
Into Pantomime season early this year
Oh no it isn'tIt really is
She may have a good chance of succeeding.
What I worry more is achieving ones life time goal too early.
She will have to keep topping her dream in order to keep her motivation high.
But sailing around the world is some what big enough.
Well, here they say 10 years are mandatory but I've heard of people who stopped school after primary school(4 years), so I have no idea how well it is enforced or how exactly it works. Maybe the dutch system is similarly foolproof.![]()
![]()
![]()
"Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu
Oh yes it is
http://www.leerplicht.net/
Leerplicht geldt voor kinderen van 5 tot 18 jaar. Vanaf de eerste dag van de maand nadat een kind 5 jaar wordt tot het einde van het schooljaar waarin het 16 jaar is geworden is een kind leerplichtig.
Now I don't have to translate that do I.
no you don't,Now I don't have to translate that do I.
Can you translate this instead?
Nederlandse Vereniging voor Thuisonderwijs
Then explain why home school cannot be VERBOTEN
Then again you already know it isn't actually and there are exceptions to mandatory education which means it isn't mandatory and home schooling is not forbidden.
So....Oh no it isn't![]()
Yes as I said exceptions are being made, you don't understands how law works here, it's a guide rather than something set in stone. Weed is illegal, prostitution is illegal, homeschooling is illegal. It works both ways, they are trying to 'discourage' her by actually applying the law for a change.
I am afraid it is you who doesn't know your own laws.you don't understands how law works here
Look.
Weedis illegal, prostitution is legal and home schooling is not illegal.Weed is illegal, prostitution is illegal, homeschooling is illegal.
Not bad going Frag , you only got 2 out of 3 wrong![]()
No I am not wrong, it is allowed under certain circumstances but that is not a rule but the very specifics. It's no but really yes but at least more yes then yes is no and only admittingly yes. I do.
No I am not wrong
You claims concerning the law invloved the words "forbidden" and "mandatory", since neither is true then you are wrong. Just like you are wrong about 2 out of the 3 examples of legality you mentioned.
So its "no but yes but no but yes but no"It's no but really yes but at least more yes then yes is no and only admittingly yes.
Well Done Frag , you have turned into Vicky Pollard![]()
Bookmarks